Functional Analysis and Successful Treatment of a Captive Rhesus Macaque’s Disruptive Behavior

Franklin, Andrea; Martin, Allison L.; Perlman, Jaine E.; Bloomsmith, Mollie A.

doi:10.1080/10888705.2021.1931868

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Functional analysis has been used to assess and treat self‐directed behaviors as well as disruptive or aggressive behaviors in nonhuman primates and in birds (Table 1 ). In all cases, a function‐based treatment consisting of some combination of extinction, differential reinforcement, noncontingent reinforcement, or some combination, have successfully reduced these problem behaviors (Dorey et al, 2009 ; Farmer‐Dougan, 2014 ; Franklin et al, 2022 ; Martin et al, 2011 ; Morris & Slocum, 2019 ).…”

Section: Current and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later

Fernández¹,

Martin²

2022

J of App Behav Analysis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The field of applied behavior analysis has been directly involved in both research and applications of behavioral principles to improve the lives of captive zoo animals. Thirty years ago, Forthman and Ogden (1992) wrote one of the first papers documenting some of these efforts. Since that time, considerable work has been done using behavioral principles and procedures to guide zoo welfare efforts. The current paper reexamines and updates Forthman and Ogden's original points, with attention to the 5 categories they detailed: (a) promotion of species‐typical behavior, (b) reintroduction and repatriation of endangered species, (c) animal handling, (d) pest control, and (e) animal performances. In addition, we outline 3 current and future directions for behavior analytic endeavors: (a) experimental analyses of behavior and the zoo, (b) applied behavior analysis and the zoo, and (c) single‐case designs and the zoo. The goal is to provide a framework that can guide future behavioral research in zoos, as well as create applications based on these empirical evaluations.

show abstract

Section: Current and Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later

Fernández¹,

Martin²

2022

J of App Behav Analysis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, coming full circle, researchers are now successfully adapting and using protocols developed for use with people to impact animal welfare. For example, functional analysis protocols have been used to assess and treat problem behaviors in animals (Dorey et al, 2009;Farmer-Dougan, 2014;Feuerbacher & Wynne, 2016;Franklin et al, 2021;Hall et al, 2015;Martin et al, 2011;Mehrkam et al, 2020;Morris & Slocum, 2019;Pfaller-Sadovsky et al, 2019;Salmeron et al, 2021), and empirical preference assessments have been successfully used in a variety of species (Brox et al, 2021;Cameron et al, 2013;Clay et al, 2009;Clayton & Shrock, 2020;Dorey et al, 2015;Fay & Miller, 2015;Fernandez et al, 2004;Fernandez & Timberlake, 2005;Gaalema et al, 2011;Martin et al, 2018;Mehrkam & Dorey, 2014;Slocum & Morris, 2020;Vicars et al, 2014;Woods et al, 2020). By using a behavior analytic lens, adapting existing behavioral technologies, and developing new, animal-specific, behavioral protocols and methodologies, behavior analysts could play a considerable role in guiding the next advances in modern zoos.…”

Section: The Future Of Behavior Analysis In Zoosmentioning

confidence: 99%

Animal Training, Environmental Enrichment, and Animal Welfare: A History of Behavior Analysis in Zoos (Preprint)

Fernández¹,

Martin²

2021

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The modern zoo has been associated with two major behavioral welfare advances: (a) the use of training to increase voluntary husbandry care, and (b) the implementation of environmental enrichment to promote naturalistic behaviors. Both practices have their roots in behavior analysis, or the operant conditioning-centered, reward-based approach to behavioral psychology. Operant conditioning served as the foundation for the development of reinforcement-based training methods commonly used in zoos to make veterinary and husbandry procedures easier and safer for animals and their caregivers. Likewise, operant conditioning, with its focus on arranging environmental antecedents and consequences to change behavior, also provided a framework for successful environmental enrichment practices. In this paper, we outline the key individuals and events that shaped two of the cornerstones of the modern zoo: (1) the emergence of reward-based husbandry training practices, and (2) the engineering of environmental enrichment. In addition, we (3) suggest ways in which behavior analysis can continue to advance zoo welfare by (i) expanding the efficacy of environmental enrichment, (ii) using within-subject methodology, and (iii) improving animal-visitor interactions. Our goal is to provide a historical and contextual reference for future efforts to improve the well-being of zoo animals.

show abstract

Nonhuman primate abnormal behavior: Etiology, assessment, and treatment

Lutz

Coleman

Hopper

et al. 2022

American J Primatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Across captive settings, nonhuman primates may develop an array of abnormal behaviors including stereotypic and self-injurious behavior. Abnormal behavior can indicate a state of poor welfare, since it is often associated with a suboptimal environment. However, this may not always be the case as some behaviors can develop independently of any psychological distress, be triggered in environments known to promote welfare, and be part of an animal's coping mechanism. Furthermore, not all animals develop abnormal behavior, which has led researchers to assess risk factors that differentiate individuals in the display of these behaviors. Intrinsic risk factors that have been identified include the animal's species and genetics, age, sex, temperament, and clinical condition, while environmental risk factors include variables such as the animal's rearing, housing condition, husbandry procedures, and research experiences. To identify specific triggers and at-risk animals, the expression of abnormal behavior in captive nonhuman primates should be routinely addressed in a consistent manner by appropriately trained staff. Which behaviors to assess, what assessment methods to use, which primates to monitor, and the aims of data collection should all be identified before proceeding to an intervention and/or treatment. This article provides guidance for this process, by presenting an overview of known triggers and risk factors that should be considered, steps to design a comprehensive evaluation plan, and strategies that might be used for prevention or treatment. It also outlines the tools and processes for assessing and evaluating behavior in an appendix. This process will lead to a better understanding of abnormal behavior in captive primate colonies and ultimately to improved welfare.

show abstract

Functional Analysis and Successful Treatment of a Captive Rhesus Macaque’s Disruptive Behavior

Cited by 4 publications

References 35 publications

Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later

Applied behavior analysis and the zoo: Forthman and Ogden (1992) thirty years later

Animal Training, Environmental Enrichment, and Animal Welfare: A History of Behavior Analysis in Zoos (Preprint)

Nonhuman primate abnormal behavior: Etiology, assessment, and treatment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About