1988
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(88)90060-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional analysis and treatment of Bizarre speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behavior analysts have studied the behavioral function of bizarre speech in nondemented patient populations. Multiple studies have been conducted with individuals who have an intellectual disability (DeLeon, Arnold, Rodriguez-Catter, & Uy, 2003;Mace & Lalli, 1991), schizophrenia (Wilder, Masuda, O'Connor, & Baham, 2001;Wilder, White, & Lu, 2003), traumatic brain injury (Travis & Sturmey, 2010), and dual diagnoses (Dixon, Benedict, & Larson, 2001;Lancaster et al, 2004;Mace, Webb, Sharkey, Mattson, & Rosen, 1988). In all but one of these studies, Lancaster et al, a social consequence maintained bizarre speech, and attention was the most common consequence that influenced bizarre speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavior analysts have studied the behavioral function of bizarre speech in nondemented patient populations. Multiple studies have been conducted with individuals who have an intellectual disability (DeLeon, Arnold, Rodriguez-Catter, & Uy, 2003;Mace & Lalli, 1991), schizophrenia (Wilder, Masuda, O'Connor, & Baham, 2001;Wilder, White, & Lu, 2003), traumatic brain injury (Travis & Sturmey, 2010), and dual diagnoses (Dixon, Benedict, & Larson, 2001;Lancaster et al, 2004;Mace, Webb, Sharkey, Mattson, & Rosen, 1988). In all but one of these studies, Lancaster et al, a social consequence maintained bizarre speech, and attention was the most common consequence that influenced bizarre speech.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%