2002
DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.1.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional analysis of the C-terminal flanking sequence of platelet glycoprotein Ibα using canine–human chimeras

Abstract: Platelet glycoprotein Ib-IX-V (GPIb-IX-V) mediates adhesion to von Willebrand factor (vWF) in (patho)physiological thrombus formation. vWF binds the N-terminal 282 residues of GPIb␣, consisting of an N-terminal flank (His1-Ile35), 7 leucinerich repeats (Leu36-Ala200), a C-terminal flank (Phe201-Gly268), and a sulfated tyrosine sequence (Asp269-Glu282). By expressing canine-human chimeras of GPIb␣ on Chinese hamster ovary cells, binding sites for functional anti-GPIb␣ antibodies to individual domains were previ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited by antibodies that inhibit ristocetininduced aggregation (AN51, MB45, and AP-1) but not by antibodies that inhibited thrombin binding or botrocetin-induced aggregation (Vm16-d and SZ2). 36,37 The latter result differs from that reported by Sullam and coworkers 38 who found that SZ2 inhibited S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation, but this is likely to be due to the use of different strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited by antibodies that inhibit ristocetininduced aggregation (AN51, MB45, and AP-1) but not by antibodies that inhibited thrombin binding or botrocetin-induced aggregation (Vm16-d and SZ2). 36,37 The latter result differs from that reported by Sullam and coworkers 38 who found that SZ2 inhibited S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation, but this is likely to be due to the use of different strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation was inhibited by antibodies that inhibit ristocetininduced aggregation (AN51, MB45, and AP-1) but not by antibodies that inhibited thrombin binding or botrocetin-induced aggregation (Vm16-d and SZ2). 36,37 The latter result differs from that reported by Sullam and coworkers 38 who found that SZ2 inhibited S sanguis-induced platelet aggregation, but this is likely to be due to the use of different strains.Platelet aggregation by S sanguis (type I and type II) was also inhibited by antibody to the Fc␥RIIA receptor, which is a platelet IgG receptor. Whereas in the case of the type II strain NCTC 7863 this is due to an interaction with bacterial-bound IgG, in the case of 133-79 antibody is not required for aggregation and the antiFc␥RIIA antibody does not inhibit adhesion suggesting no direct role for a Fc␥RIIA-IgG interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…27 Of all the GP Ib␣ antibodies, only AP1 can block the interaction of GP Ib␣ with VWF, thrombin, and Mac-1, rendering its epitope of intense interest for understanding the ligand-binding functions of GP Ib␣. The AP1 epitope has been narrowed to the sequence Phe201 to Glu225, 28 which comprises the ␣1 helix followed by the ␤13 strand. 3,4 In this study, our intent was to map the epitope in detail and to test the effects on VWF binding function of amino acid substitutions within the epitope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mAb AK2 binds at the first LRR, residues 36-59. 20,21 The mAb VM16d binds at residues 201 to 268 of the C-terminal region 13,21 and WM23 binds at the macroglycopeptide region downstream to residue 282 20 ( Figure 6A). The binding of AK2 and VM16d were compared to that of WM23, which binds outside the VWF-binding region, to adjust for differences in surface expression of GPIb␣ between transfected cell lines.…”
Section: Expression Of the Wt And Mut Gpib␣ Receptor In Cho ␤/Ix Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Four regions within the amino-terminal domain contribute to VWF binding: N-terminal flank (His1-lle35), LRRs (Leu36-Ala200 residues), C-terminal disulfide loop (Phe201-Gly268), and an anionic tyrosine sulfated region (Asp269-Glu282). [11][12][13] The interaction between VWF and its platelet receptor GPIb␣ is essential for platelet adhesion at sites of high-shear stress. Structural changes affecting GPIb␣ are responsible for the PT-VWD phenotype.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%