2002
DOI: 10.1128/jb.184.22.6343-6350.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Analysis of TraA, the Sex Pheromone Receptor Encoded by pPD1, in a Promoter Region Essential for the Mating Response in Enterococcus faecalis

Abstract: Conjugative transfer of a bacteriocin plasmid, pPD1, of Enterococcus faecalis is induced in response to a peptide sex pheromone, cPD1, secreted from plasmid-free recipient cells. cPD1 is taken up by a pPD1 donor cell and binds to an intracellular receptor, TraA. Once a recipient cell acquires pPD1, it starts to produce an inhibitor of cPD1, termed iPD1, which functions as a TraA antagonist and blocks self-induction in donor cells. In this study, we discuss how TraA transduces the signal of cPD1 to the mating r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pheromone is then internalized, making use of a host-encoded peptide transport system (for a recent detailed review, see reference 44). A functional analysis of TraA, the intracellular sex pheromone receptor encoded by pPD1, was recently performed (99). When cPD1 is taken up by a pPD1 donor cell, it binds to an intracellular receptor, TraA.…”
Section: Sex Pheromone Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pheromone is then internalized, making use of a host-encoded peptide transport system (for a recent detailed review, see reference 44). A functional analysis of TraA, the intracellular sex pheromone receptor encoded by pPD1, was recently performed (99). When cPD1 is taken up by a pPD1 donor cell, it binds to an intracellular receptor, TraA.…”
Section: Sex Pheromone Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…faecalis sex-pheromone-responding conjugative plasmids pCF10, pAD1 and pPD1 (Bae & Dunny, 2001;Bae et al, 2002Bae et al, , 2004Horii et al, 2002; for reviews see Clewell & Dunny, 2002;Chandler & Dunny, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mismatch between the middle peak and the expected position of tab2 can be due to a non-symmetric binding of TraA at this site or to a misinterpretation of previously published footprinting data. 10 What is surprising, however, is that the frequency of TraA binding to a specific tab site changes under the different conditions used. Namely, TraA alone binds tab1, tab2 and tab3 with probability values of 0.57, 0.17 and 0.26, respectively; TraA-cPD1 binds tab1, tab2 and tab3 with probability values of 0.32, 0.23 and 0.45, respectively; and TraA-iPD1 binds tab1, tab2 and tab3 with probability values of 0.52, 0.22 and 0.26, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…9 More recently, it has been demonstrated by DNA footprinting experiments that TraA specifically recognizes three distinct sites of approximately 26 bp, one strong (tab1) and two weak (tab2 and tab3), located in the DNA region encompassing the ipd and traA genes. 10 It has also been shown by means of Northern blotting analysis that the transcription is up-regulated and down-regulated for the ipd and traA genes, respectively, by exogenous cPD1. 10 In this study, we employed several techniques to analyze the interaction between TraA and specific regions of the pPD1 plasmid both in the presence and in the absence of cPD1 and iPD1 regulator peptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation