Functional and Aesthetic Results After Augmentation Rhinoplasty

Blanco, Mercedes Álvarez-Buylla; García, Adolfo Sarandeses; Vieites, Jacobo Chao; Fernández, Rosa Babarro; Abelenda, Carmen Deus; Seara, Anselmo Padín

doi:10.1016/j.otoeng.2011.03.008

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mean age of patients was 33 (age range 10-72). Although 3 papers did not specify mean and/or age range [16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four hundred twenty-eight cases were male and 2573 were female although 10 studies did not specify gender [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The mean follow-up time was 30 months with a range of 3 months to 15 years.…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mean follow-up time was 30 months with a range of 3 months to 15 years. Two papers did not report mean follow-up time specifically [16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The included materials were conducted between years 1980 and 2019 in the following countries: South Korea , the USA , Spain [17], Taiwan [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], the UK [24], Turkey [26], Canada [27], Netherlands [28], China [34], Iran [29], Sweden [37], and Philippines [11].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Prevalence of complications associated with polymer-based alloplastic materials in nasal dorsal augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Keyhan¹,

Ramezanzade²,

Yazdi³

et al. 2022

Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Various techniques with different grafts and implants have been proposed to establish a smooth and symmetric nasal dorsum with adequate function. Broadly, two categories of materials have been used in this regard: alloplastic implant materials and autograft materials. The aim of these meta-analyses is to explore the incidence of complications after dorsum augmentation surgery using alloplastic materials. Materials and methods After duplication removal 491 papers remained that title and abstract were assessed for eligibility. Regarding the study type, 27 observational studies were included, 21 retrospective and 6 prospective case series. A total of 3803 cases were enrolled in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Result Twenty-seven articles reported on complications and outcomes of dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with synthetic materials. In a random-effects model, the weighted mean percentage was 2.75% (95% CI 1.61 to 4.17%). the weighted mean percentage were 1.91% (95% CI 0.77 to 3.54%), 0.72% (95% CI 0.316 to 1.31%), and 0.78% (95% CI 0.43 to 1.24%) respectively. Conclusion The widely used alloplasts were expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE), high-density polyethylene, and silicone. The total rates for complications, infection, deviation, irregularity, hematoma, extrusion, and overcorrection were 2.75%, 1.91%, 0.72%, 0.70%, 0.78%, and 0.49%, respectively. The revision rate, based on the random effects model, was 6.40% with 95%CI (3.84 to 9.57). Trial registration This meta-analysis was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020209644).

show abstract

“…The mean age of patients was 33 (age range 10-72). Although 3 papers did not specify mean and/or age range [16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mean follow-up time was 30 months with a range of 3 months to 15 years. Two papers did not report mean follow-up time specifically [16][17][18][19].…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%