2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.02.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and aesthetic results obtained by modified Bernard reconstruction technique after tumour excision in lower lip cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method limit to the elderly patients only or patients with facial tissue laxity as the tension of lower lip skin tissue after surgery would give rise to microstomia of patients. 21,22 Since the subjects included in this study were all young patients whose facial tissue was tense and with a large full-thickness defect in the lower lip, it was difficult to achieve the expected surgical goal simply by applying Bernard flap. After Bernard flap repair, the average mouth width of the patients was 3.18 AE 0.31 cm, and the average height of mouth opening was only 1.32 AE 0.22 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method limit to the elderly patients only or patients with facial tissue laxity as the tension of lower lip skin tissue after surgery would give rise to microstomia of patients. 21,22 Since the subjects included in this study were all young patients whose facial tissue was tense and with a large full-thickness defect in the lower lip, it was difficult to achieve the expected surgical goal simply by applying Bernard flap. After Bernard flap repair, the average mouth width of the patients was 3.18 AE 0.31 cm, and the average height of mouth opening was only 1.32 AE 0.22 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lip functions and aesthetic appearance were assessed at least 1 year later. The scoring system consists of a functional assessment and aesthetic assessment [ 11 ]. The functional assessment included evaluations of sensitivity, competence, and mouth opening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most cases requiring reconstruction result from tumor ablation 2 . Surgeons worldwide have made efforts to devise new methods and improve surgical techniques, varying from primary closing and local flaps to free flap transfer, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages 3–8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Surgeons worldwide have made efforts to devise new methods and improve surgical techniques, varying from primary closing and local flaps to free flap transfer, each of which has its advantages and disadvantages. [3][4][5][6][7][8] Major lower lip defects have been repaired in many ways, including flaps from the chin, cheek, or upper lip, considering the defect dimensions and position, patient comorbidities, and surgeon's experience. Lip switch flaps are effective for moderate lip defects but require a second stage to divide the vascular pedicle and can cause microstomia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%