2010
DOI: 10.3136/fstr.16.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and Bioactive Properties of Quinoa and Amaranth

Abstract: Antioxidant activity, antihypertensive activity and allergenicity of quinoa and amaranth were investigated and compared with those of seven cereals: buckwheat, barley, wheat, rice, foxtail millet, Japanese millet and millet. The radical scavenging activities of quinoa and amaranth were 42.3 and 22.6 mg gallic acid equivalent/g, respectively; thus, the pseudocereals have stronger radical scavenging ability than cereals. On the other hand, the antioxidant ability against linoleic acid was not very strong. Quinoa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
46
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was identical to those measured previously by the ferric thiocyanate and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine (DPPH) methods (Asao and Watanabe, 2010). The antioxidant capacity of quinoa flour was high compared to wheat flour.…”
Section: Antioxidant Capacitysupporting
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result was identical to those measured previously by the ferric thiocyanate and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazine (DPPH) methods (Asao and Watanabe, 2010). The antioxidant capacity of quinoa flour was high compared to wheat flour.…”
Section: Antioxidant Capacitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…A discrepancy in the evaluation of antioxidant activity between the ORAC assay and conventional methods such as the DPPH assay has been raised (Ichimori, 2012;Kanno et al, 2013). However, the ORAC assay used in this work gave results identical to those using conventional methods (Asao and Watanabe, 2010) in the evaluation of the antioxidant capacity of pseudocereals and cereals (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations