Functional and dysfunctional beliefs in relation to adolescent health-related quality of life

Cheie, Lavinia; Miu, Andrei C.

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.029

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence reviews have indicated that self-efficacy, or the belief that one can affect change, and outcome expectations can act as mediators for increasing healthy lifestyle behaviors in children and adolescents (Cerin, Barnett, & Baranowski, 2009;Lubans, Foster, & Biddle, 2008;Van Stralen et al, 2011). Findings from our study highlight the powerful impact that cognitive beliefs toward engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors, perceived difficulty, and self-concept have on healthy lifestyle behaviors (Cheie & Miu, 2016;Power, Ullrich-French, Steele, Daratha, & Bindler, 2011;Suchert, Hanewinkel, & Isensee, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Factors Associated With Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Among Adolescents

McGovern¹,

Militello²,

Arcoleo³

et al. 2018

Journal of Pediatric Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 63%

Factors Associated With Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Among Adolescents

McGovern¹,

Militello²,

Arcoleo³

et al. 2018

Journal of Pediatric Health Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Even in the case that younger donors were healthier and less inclined to seek medical attention, this justification would not explain our finding that older donors also showed a higher percentage of losses of follow‐up. In late adolescence, it has been shown that dysfunctional beliefs promote maladaptive health behaviour . An alternative explanation could be, then, that it was donors’ health beliefs rather than their age, which influenced the assistance to follow‐up appointments.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Death of recipients after kidney living donation triples donors’ risk of dropping out from follow-up: a retrospective study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although kidney transplantation from the donation of a living donor is a safe treatment for end-stage renal disease, inferences about safety of living kidney donors might be biased by an informative censoring caused by the noninclusion of a substantial percentage of donors lost to follow-up. With the aim of assessing the presence of a potential informative censoring in living kidney donation outcomes of Catalan donors for a period of 12 years, 573 donors followed and lost to follow-up were compared. Losses of follow-up over time were also assessed by univariate and multivariate survival analysis, along with Cox regression. Younger and older ages, and the death of their recipient differentiated those donors who were lost to follow-up over time. The risk of dropping out from follow-up was more than twofold for the youngest and oldest donors, and almost threefold for those donors whose recipient died. Results of studies on postdonation outcomes of Catalan living kidney donors might have overlooked older and younger cases, and, remarkably, a percentage of donors whose recipient died. If these donors showed a higher incidence of psychological problems, conclusions about living donors' safety might be compromised thus emphasizing the necessity of sustained surveillance of donors and prompt identification of these cases.

show abstract