2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.01.868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and Quality of Life Improvements in Treated Patients with Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported improved PROs following PEA however, they have been limited by reliance on generic PROs, small sample sizes or absence of MCIDs for the PRO tool [18,[33][34][35]. An advantage of the CAMPHOR score over generic and PH-specific PROs is its development and validation in CTEPH with multiple domains that are specific to CTPEH patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported improved PROs following PEA however, they have been limited by reliance on generic PROs, small sample sizes or absence of MCIDs for the PRO tool [18,[33][34][35]. An advantage of the CAMPHOR score over generic and PH-specific PROs is its development and validation in CTEPH with multiple domains that are specific to CTPEH patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients who declined surgery the severity of pulmonary haemodynamics and D LCO predicted outcome, with median thresholds for D LCO , right atrial pressure and S vO 2 having negative predictive values for 3-year mortality >95%. For a selected cohort of patients who despite counselling decline surgery this information may be useful, although it must also be emphasised that quality of life benefits in the majority of patients are greater with surgery [36, 37]. In contrast, patients with severe haemodynamics assessed to be good surgical candidates may find data highlighting a poor prognosis in the absence of a surgical intervention an aid to decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been used in two studies of patients with CTEPH [ 46 , 51 ]. The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) was specifically developed for patients with PH, and when used has demonstrated sensitivity to changes in HRQoL in studies of patients with CTEPH or PAH [ 21 , 53 56 ]. CAMPHOR may also have use as a prognostic tool.…”
Section: Qol Measurement Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective comparison of 82 surgically and medically treated patients with CTEPH found that those receiving PAH-targeted therapies not licenced for CTEPH and patients with persistent/recurrent PH after PEA did not have significantly improved HRQoL (measured with CAMPHOR), despite improved exercise capacity, WHO FC and Borg dyspnoea score [ 56 ]. However, patients who had undergone PEA and were left with no residual PH had significantly improved HRQoL scores in all three CAMPHOR domains (p<0.001).…”
Section: Effects Of Treatment On Qol In Patients With Ctephmentioning
confidence: 99%