Functional Articulation Disorders: Preliminaries to Treatment

Shelton, Ralph L.; McReynolds, Leija V.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-608602-7.50007-9

Cited by 13 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 119 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Children whose primary errors are those of omission are often considered to comprise a separate subgroup within the realm of "articulation disorders" (Shelton & McReynolds, 1979). Of relevance to the present study is an investigation by Frisch and Handler( 1974)whocompared normal children, children whose errors were predominantly sound substitutions, and children whose errors were predominantly omissions on performances on the Reitan-Indiana Neuropsychological Test Battery for Children.…”

Section: Relations Among Error Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phonological error patterns in developmental verbal dyspraxia

Crary¹,

Landess²,

Towne³

1984

Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phonological error patterns are analyzed in a group of 10 children presenting symptoms consistent with Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia. Results indicate a dominance of "sequentially constrained" errors primarily involving sound and syllable omissions and timing errors. Rank-order correlations among the phonological errors and between phonological errors and developmental indices suggest that these children have a specific expressive language problem dominated by phonological errors of sequential reduction. Interpretation of the data points to a central motor planning deficit. Comparisons are made with other studies depicting neuropsychological deficits in similar children.

show abstract

Section: Relations Among Error Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phonological error patterns in developmental verbal dyspraxia

Crary¹,

Landess²,

Towne³

1984

Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Not only did the articulation-impaired group perform significantly poorer on this comprehension test, but a correlational analysis indicated that children who made the greatest number of articulation errors also made the most number of comprehension errors. As pointed out by Shelton and McReynolds (1979), however, the latter finding is mitigated somewhat by the fact that, though significant, the correlations were only in the moderate range (e.g., r = .44).…”

Section: Comparative Studiesmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…(see, for example, Shelton and McReynolds, 1979). In addition to descriptions of the phonological processes which influence these children's speech-productions, several recent studies (Edwards and Bernhardt, 1973;Hodson and Paden, 1981;Ingram, 1976Ingram, , 1981) have attempted to determine whether or not children with speech-sound difficulties demonstrate the same phonological processes as normal children.…”

Section: Phonological Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on the Relationship Between Phonological and Language Disorders

Aram¹,

Kamhi²

1982

Semin Hear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…On the research side, the push to identify the conditions that promote language learning has resulted in a number of principles (e.g. McReynolds, 1972; Shelton and McReynolds, 1979; Dinnsen and Elbert, 1984; Elbert, Dinnsen, and Powell, 1984; Elbert, Powell, and Swartzlander, 1991; Tyler and Sandoval, 1994; Gierut, 2001) and methods (e.g. Weiner, 1981; Koegel, Koegel, and Ingham, 1986; Dean, Howell, Waters, and Reid, 1995; Miccio and Elbert, 1996; Ingram and Ingram, 2001) that are prime for extension to clinical settings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence-based practice: A matrix for predicting phonological generalization

Gierut

Hulse

2010

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes a matrix for clinical use in the selection of phonological treatment targets to induce generalization, and in the identification of probe sounds to monitor during the course of intervention. The matrix appeals to a set of factors that have been shown to promote phonological generalization in the research literature, including the nature of error patterns, implicational universals, developmental norms, and stimulability. A case study of a child with a phonological disorder is presented to illustrate how the matrix may be utilized in evidence-based practice. The matrix serves as a demonstration of how the translation of research to practice may be accomplished.

show abstract

Functional Articulation Disorders: Preliminaries to Treatment

Cited by 13 publications

References 119 publications

Phonological error patterns in developmental verbal dyspraxia

Phonological error patterns in developmental verbal dyspraxia

Perspectives on the Relationship Between Phonological and Language Disorders

Evidence-based practice: A matrix for predicting phonological generalization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About