2008
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205240.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Beauty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, it cannot be ruled out that the participants arrived at their conclusions on the basis of outward appearance of the supposed harmfulness or usefulness of a species, without drawing on their knowledge of its biology (''A cute rabbit can't possibly be a pest'' and ''a nasty snake can't be a useful creature''). In this context we refer to the controversial debate on 'environmental aesthetics' (e.g., Parsons & Carlson, 2008); the cognitivistic view is united by the idea that knowledge and information about the nature of an object is central to its aesthetic appreciation, which Carlson (1984) illustrates with the whale. As a mammal, the whale is graceful; were it to be perceived as a fish, it might appear somewhat clumsy.…”
Section: Motivation For Affinity Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, it cannot be ruled out that the participants arrived at their conclusions on the basis of outward appearance of the supposed harmfulness or usefulness of a species, without drawing on their knowledge of its biology (''A cute rabbit can't possibly be a pest'' and ''a nasty snake can't be a useful creature''). In this context we refer to the controversial debate on 'environmental aesthetics' (e.g., Parsons & Carlson, 2008); the cognitivistic view is united by the idea that knowledge and information about the nature of an object is central to its aesthetic appreciation, which Carlson (1984) illustrates with the whale. As a mammal, the whale is graceful; were it to be perceived as a fish, it might appear somewhat clumsy.…”
Section: Motivation For Affinity Ratingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2013;Gunnarson, B. et al 2017). Nevertheless, preferences change over time, including historical times (Bodenstein, E. 1972) and it is also recognised that aesthetic preferences influenced by the experience, knowledge and use of landscapes (Knudsen, D.C. et al 1995;Bodnár, R.K. 2008;Parsons, G. and Carlson, A. 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I said before, Functional Beauty accounts hold that appreciating certain aesthetic properties requires appreciating the design object as designed for a particular function. Parsons & Carlson (2008) and Stephen Davies (2010) agree that it is "a kind of beauty that objects exhibit by virtue of the kind of function they have and whose appreciation requires knowledge about its function". 9 For P&C, our aesthetic judgements must be based on a perceptual experience of the object's appearance as seeing under the corresponding 'functional category' we apply to the object.…”
Section: The Functional Approach: Functional Beauty Accountsmentioning
confidence: 99%