Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective To evaluate the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of bioceramic rods (BR) in treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), compared with other treatments such as core decompression and autologous bone grafting. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Pubmed, Embase, and CNKI databases from January 2011 to July 2023. Eligibility criteria for study selection Included studies involved patients treated with bioceramic rods. Studies were required to have a follow-up time of more than six months and no statistically significant differences in baseline information between groups in controlled studies. Exclusions included literature reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, animal experiments, and studies without defined success criteria or lacking analysis on factors influencing efficacy. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) improvement rate. Secondary outcomes included the femoral head stability and survival rate, alongside the hip replacement rate. Results The systematic review revealed significant improvements in symptom relief and functional recovery using BR for the treatment of ONFH. An average follow-up of 20.44 months showed an overall HHS improvement rate of 33.93%. Hip preservation efficacy with BR was superior to core decompression and autologous bone grafting. The overall femoral head survival rate was 84.42%, with results sustained for three years. The success rate of hip preservation was notably higher with early intervention, which showed better outcomes when the overall HHS improvement exceeded 27%, and rates of excellent and good outcomes approached 90%. Conclusions Bioceramic rods offer a safe, minimally invasive, reliable, and effective treatment option for ONFH, ensuring substantial symptom relief and functional recovery. The technique’s success in early disease stages suggests a strong potential for broader clinical adoption. Although additional benefits from combining BR with stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and traditional Chinese medicine are noted, definitive conclusions on enhanced therapeutic effects remain inconclusive.
Objective To evaluate the safety, reliability, and effectiveness of bioceramic rods (BR) in treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), compared with other treatments such as core decompression and autologous bone grafting. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Pubmed, Embase, and CNKI databases from January 2011 to July 2023. Eligibility criteria for study selection Included studies involved patients treated with bioceramic rods. Studies were required to have a follow-up time of more than six months and no statistically significant differences in baseline information between groups in controlled studies. Exclusions included literature reviews, case reports, conference abstracts, animal experiments, and studies without defined success criteria or lacking analysis on factors influencing efficacy. Main outcome measures The primary outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) improvement rate. Secondary outcomes included the femoral head stability and survival rate, alongside the hip replacement rate. Results The systematic review revealed significant improvements in symptom relief and functional recovery using BR for the treatment of ONFH. An average follow-up of 20.44 months showed an overall HHS improvement rate of 33.93%. Hip preservation efficacy with BR was superior to core decompression and autologous bone grafting. The overall femoral head survival rate was 84.42%, with results sustained for three years. The success rate of hip preservation was notably higher with early intervention, which showed better outcomes when the overall HHS improvement exceeded 27%, and rates of excellent and good outcomes approached 90%. Conclusions Bioceramic rods offer a safe, minimally invasive, reliable, and effective treatment option for ONFH, ensuring substantial symptom relief and functional recovery. The technique’s success in early disease stages suggests a strong potential for broader clinical adoption. Although additional benefits from combining BR with stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and traditional Chinese medicine are noted, definitive conclusions on enhanced therapeutic effects remain inconclusive.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.