2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional brain hubs and their test–retest reliability: A multiband resting-state functional MRI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
162
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
16
162
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we thought that the results of binary networks in the main analysis may be more reliable, given previous findings showing a trend of greater reliability of the binary node definition of a network compared with its weighted node definition. 34,35 The results of group differences of the small-world properties could also be repeated after nonparametric permutation tests (Cp: p = 0.005; γ: p = 0.61; Lp: p = 0.07; λ: p = 0.023). For the measures of nodal degree or efficiency, most of the results were preserved after scrubbing and accounting for the effects of parcellation strategies and network types (Appendix 1, Fig.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we thought that the results of binary networks in the main analysis may be more reliable, given previous findings showing a trend of greater reliability of the binary node definition of a network compared with its weighted node definition. 34,35 The results of group differences of the small-world properties could also be repeated after nonparametric permutation tests (Cp: p = 0.005; γ: p = 0.61; Lp: p = 0.07; λ: p = 0.023). For the measures of nodal degree or efficiency, most of the results were preserved after scrubbing and accounting for the effects of parcellation strategies and network types (Appendix 1, Fig.…”
Section: Reproducibility Of the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]46 GTA is a network analysis tool that has been commonly used in functional neuroimaging to study brain connectivity and networks. [13][14][15]18,19 To date, however, atlas-DOT and GTA have not been used jointly to extract or derive large-scale brain connectivity and networks from the NIRS measurements because of computational challenges posed by atlas-DOT. Specifically, graph formation in GTA is a difficult and computationally expensive process for atlas-DOT because of the large amount of voxels in atlas-DOT images.…”
Section: Development Of Automated Voxel Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph theory analysis (GTA) is one of the analytical methods developed to examine largescale complex brain networks. [13][14][15]18,19 It can provide an uncomplicated and yet powerful mathematical means to characterize the brain networks' topological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers continue to take seriously the effort to systematically measure the factors that influence test/ retest reliability of responses across time and tasks, and these sorts of studies are increasingly common [83][84][85][86][87][88] . Other research programs focus on addressing questions about the long-term within-subject stability of responses [89][90] , and how the accurate assessment of within-participant differences might address questions about individual differences 93 .…”
Section: Results Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%