2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive–affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia

Abstract: Pain requires the integration of sensory, cognitive, and affective information. The use of placebo is a common methodological ploy in many fields, including pain. Neuroimaging studies of pain and placebo analgesia (PA) have yet to identify a mechanism of action. Because PA must result from higher order processes, it is likely influenced by cognitive and affective dimensions of the pain experience. A network of brain regions involved in these processes includes the anterior and posterior insula (A-Ins, P-Ins), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
88
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, the role of prefrontal regions in pain, placebo analgesia, and their modulations by analgesic drugs is also demonstrated. 23,24 These studies provided us with the motivation to further explore the role of the prefrontal cortical regions in cognitive evaluation of pain by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).…”
Section: Relationship Between Pain and The Prefrontal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, the role of prefrontal regions in pain, placebo analgesia, and their modulations by analgesic drugs is also demonstrated. 23,24 These studies provided us with the motivation to further explore the role of the prefrontal cortical regions in cognitive evaluation of pain by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).…”
Section: Relationship Between Pain and The Prefrontal Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placebo hypoalgesia appears related to descending inhibition of pain from the supraspinal structures and functional MRI is beginning to clarify specific brain regions likely involved in placebo hypoalgesia. Current studies suggest that placeborelated hypoalgesia is associated with responses in regions of the brain related to pain modulation, [45][46][47] emotion, [47][48][49] and cognitive appraisal. 41,48 Both the opioid system 50,51 and the reward system 52,53 are involved in placebo-related hypoalgesia and brain imaging further supports these relationships.…”
Section: Physiological Mechanisms Of Placebo Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current studies suggest that placeborelated hypoalgesia is associated with responses in regions of the brain related to pain modulation, [45][46][47] emotion, [47][48][49] and cognitive appraisal. 41,48 Both the opioid system 50,51 and the reward system 52,53 are involved in placebo-related hypoalgesia and brain imaging further supports these relationships. 54,55 Additionally, the placebo effect is significantly lessened in patients with Alzheimer's disease with pre-frontal cortex involvement 56 and can be abolished with experimental disruption of the prefrontal cortex through transcranial magnetic stimulation.…”
Section: Physiological Mechanisms Of Placebo Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This category includes structural equation modeling (SEM) [56][57][58][59][60][61][62], multivariate autoregressive (MAR) modeling [63,64], dynamic causal modeling (DCM) [65][66][67], generative models including neural mass models [68,69] and large-scale neural models [70][71][72].…”
Section: Hypothesis-driven Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increasing number of PET, fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have used SEM to investigate large-scale functional brain networks [90][91][92][93] and show specific networks involved in either working memory [94][95][96][97][98][99][100], attentional processes [64,[101][102][103], face perception [104][105][106], motor movement processing [61,[107][108][109][110][111][112], language [32,113,114] or processing of painful stimuli [62].…”
Section: Structural Equation Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%