1979
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90790-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional changes in cat somatic sensory-motor cortex during short-term reversible epidural blocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus many studies have found differences in perceptive fields, the appearance of discontinuous fields and increased convergence Kalahan et al 1981;Metzler & Marks, 1979;Dostrovsky & Millar, 1977;Franck, 1980). While 'flick' units and increased habituation were not found here, the longer latencies and lower following frequencies, without alteration in threshold, would suggest activation of a similar population of afferents but a poorer synaptic function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Thus many studies have found differences in perceptive fields, the appearance of discontinuous fields and increased convergence Kalahan et al 1981;Metzler & Marks, 1979;Dostrovsky & Millar, 1977;Franck, 1980). While 'flick' units and increased habituation were not found here, the longer latencies and lower following frequencies, without alteration in threshold, would suggest activation of a similar population of afferents but a poorer synaptic function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Rapid changes similar to these cortical changes have been observed in the adult rat spinal cord after injury of hindlimb nerves (Devor and Wall, 198 1 a;Markus et al, 1984;Wall and Devor, 1981), and at cortical and subcortical levels in other adult mammals (Dostrovsky et al, 1976;Jacquin et al, 1984;Kelahan and Doetsch, 1984;Metzler and Marks, 1979;Millar et al, 1976;Rasmusson and Tumbull, 1983), including primates (Merzenich and Kaas, 1982;Merzenith et al, 1983b), after a variety of peripheral injuries and manipulations. There is considerable evidence that normal cutaneous receptive fields do not fully reflect the wider range of inputs available to central somatosensory neurons (Chapin and Woodward, 198 1;Devor and Wall, 198 1 b;Devor et al, 1977;Dostrovsky et al, 1977;Jacquin et al, 1984;Macgillis et al, 1983;Mendell et al, 1978;Merrill and Wall, 1972;Mountcastle, 1957;Wall and Werman, 1976).…”
Section: Present Jindingsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…At the level of the cortex, Metzler & Marks (1979) found that reversibly blocking the L4 and L5 dorsal roots resulted in receptive field shifts for about 30% of the units they tested.…”
Section: Relation To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Wall & Egger, 1971;Millar, Basbaum & Wall, 1976;Dostrovsky, Millar & Wall, 1976;Devor & Wall, 1981 a, b), have demonstrated that either acute or chronic deafferentation profoundly alters the receptive fields of individual somatosensory neurones, as well as the topographic organization of the somatosensory cortex, ventrobasal thalamus and dorsal column nuclei. Comparison of results obtained following acute (or reversible) and chronic denervation has indicated that substantial receptive field changes are more often observed at long intervals (>7 days) following deafferentation (see also Nakahama, Nishioka & Otsuka, 1966;Waite & Taylor, 1978;Metzler & Marks, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%