2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional classifications for cerebral palsy: Correlations between the gross motor function classification system (GMFCS), the manual ability classification system (MACS) and the communication function classification system (CFCS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
42
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
42
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although each classification system measures different functional aspects in children with CP, they all contribute to determining the function of children with CP in terms of ICF. Previous studies reported that none of the correlation coefficients of the classification systems indicated a very strong relationship, as observed in our study3, 19 ) . The use of a single system is inadequate for describing the functional level of children with CP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Although each classification system measures different functional aspects in children with CP, they all contribute to determining the function of children with CP in terms of ICF. Previous studies reported that none of the correlation coefficients of the classification systems indicated a very strong relationship, as observed in our study3, 19 ) . The use of a single system is inadequate for describing the functional level of children with CP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…And indeed, the associations among functional profiles of the children with CP have been investigated previously (Compagnone et al, ; Hidecker et al, ; Himmelmann, Beckung, Hagberg, & Uvebrant, ). Both strong associations between the CFCS and MACS and GMFCS have been demonstrated in some previous studies (Compagnone et al, ; Himmelmann et al, ), as well as only moderate to weak associations were demonstrated between them in another previous study of larger sample size (Hidecker et al, ). Although there were moderate to weak associations of the CFCS and the VSS with the GMFCS and the MACS in the present study, the small sample size of present study has limitation in assessing the associations between functional profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, available studies indicate that -similar to our sample -most children and adolescents with PD have low levels of physical impairment (e.g., Reid et al 2011). Only individuals with the most severe PD level were underrepresented in our study, probably because of strong correlations between physical and cognitive impairments (r = 0.66, Compagnone et al 2014) and the fact that we excluded students who would have been cognitively unable to answer our questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%