2014
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Clusters, Hubs, and Communities in the Cortical Microconnectome

Abstract: Although relationships between networks of different scales have been observed in macroscopic brain studies, relationships between structures of different scales in networks of neurons are unknown. To address this, we recorded from up to 500 neurons simultaneously from slice cultures of rodent somatosensory cortex. We then measured directed effective networks with transfer entropy, previously validated in simulated cortical networks. These effective networks enabled us to evaluate distinctive nonrandom structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
170
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
15
170
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of large-scale cellular-resolution recording methods will soon provide data sets that are amenable to the detection of functional modules in dynamic brain activity. For example, clusters of highly correlated brain regions can be derived from optical recordings of neural activity (Ahrens et al 2013) or from spike time series on multielectrode arrays (Shimono & Beggs 2015). In general, network-based module detection methods are important tools for dimension reduction and compact descriptions of functional neuronal assemblies in animal recordings.…”
Section: Evidence For Modules In Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of large-scale cellular-resolution recording methods will soon provide data sets that are amenable to the detection of functional modules in dynamic brain activity. For example, clusters of highly correlated brain regions can be derived from optical recordings of neural activity (Ahrens et al 2013) or from spike time series on multielectrode arrays (Shimono & Beggs 2015). In general, network-based module detection methods are important tools for dimension reduction and compact descriptions of functional neuronal assemblies in animal recordings.…”
Section: Evidence For Modules In Brain Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Node degree of IPL.L and CAU.L node is less than normal, so the degree of functional effect is less than normal. However, the statistics value of node IPL.L is [31][32][33] greater than 0, which indicate that the function connection strength of this region is increased in whole brain, but the experimental results show that in the local area of decline. Similarly, the same is true for the four modules selected, such as in patient module 7, node degree of ORBinf.L is greater than normal, we can believe that the correlation is relatively weak between the region and other regions, while normal human is enhanced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this calculation, a neuron pair is identified as connected when the spike history of neuron 1 improves the ability to predict the spiking activity of neuron 2 beyond the prediction based on neuron 2’s spike history alone. That is, when two neurons spike in a temporally synchronous pattern, the transfer entropy calculation will be more positive than a neuron pair that does not spike synchronously (Shimono & Beggs, 2014). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%