Encyclopedia of Special Education 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118660584.ese0965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Communication Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Previously, sufficient conditions were known for systems with a bounded number of vertices per level [3,7]. A similar condition has been given independently by Durand and Yassawi [8], and a necessary condition was mentioned in [12].) We use this condition to determine the probability that a random order on a fixed diagram, or an ordered diagram constructed at random in a certain sense, is topologically conjugate to an odometer (Examples 5.5 and 5.6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(Previously, sufficient conditions were known for systems with a bounded number of vertices per level [3,7]. A similar condition has been given independently by Durand and Yassawi [8], and a necessary condition was mentioned in [12].) We use this condition to determine the probability that a random order on a fixed diagram, or an ordered diagram constructed at random in a certain sense, is topologically conjugate to an odometer (Examples 5.5 and 5.6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This reflects what Pitonyak (2014) describes as a ‘system‐centred’ approach to care rather than a ‘person‐centred’ approach whereby adults with intellectual disability are seen as objects to be processed by the system. This raises concern about whether disability services masquerade as being person‐centred when in reality so many adults with intellectual disability are living in controlling and dehumanising environments with barren lifestyles that few of us would choose to inhabit (Durand, 1990; Osgood, 2005; Risley, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%