2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-017-9289-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Communication Training and Demand Fading Using Concurrent Schedules of Reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our study focused on instructional demands naturally occurring during NET sessions (examples of demands for Adam: "Give me," "Put on," "What color? "), other researchers evaluated reduction of problem behaviors occurring during instructional demands at school (Butler & Luiselli, 2007), academic task demands at home (Davis et al, 2018), demands to withstand a medical procedure (Shabani & Fisher, 2006) or demands for compliance, e.g., wearing a facemask (Lillie et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our study focused on instructional demands naturally occurring during NET sessions (examples of demands for Adam: "Give me," "Put on," "What color? "), other researchers evaluated reduction of problem behaviors occurring during instructional demands at school (Butler & Luiselli, 2007), academic task demands at home (Davis et al, 2018), demands to withstand a medical procedure (Shabani & Fisher, 2006) or demands for compliance, e.g., wearing a facemask (Lillie et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Peterson et al (2009) and Quigley et al (2013), several experiments demonstrated a decrease in challenging behavior with the use of asymmetricalchoice options without the use of extinction for challenging behavior (Athens & Vollmer, 2010, Experiments 1-4; in some conditions; Briggs et al, 2019;Davis et al, 2018;Martens et al, 2016;Peck Peterson et al, 2005;Peterson et al, 2017;Quigley et al, 2013;Rogalski et al, 2020), although some of these experiments observed adequate suppression under only some experimental conditions or had idiosyncratic results across participants. Because extinction can be difficult to implement in some situations due to logistical and ethical factors (Athens & Vollmer, 2010), future research should further assess the conditions under which interventions arranging asymmetrical-choice options result in clinically significant reductions in challenging behavior in the absence of extinction.…”
Section: Challenging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Relapse of challenging behavior was more likely in the two-choice condition (mands occurred during the three-choice probes), and response persistence of work during the relapse probes increased for one participant with prolonged exposure to the intervention. A different potential solution to highrate mands is exemplified in the study by Davis et al (2018). The participants in this study engaged in high-rate break mands in a two-choice arrangement.…”
Section: Challenging Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A chained schedule of reinforcement (or demand fading) procedure addresses this limitation by requiring a teacher to program for the completion of a series of tasks prior to giving a reinforcer (Hagopian et al, 2011; Piazza, Moes, & Fisher, 1996). A chained schedule of reinforcement is most suited for addressing challenging behaviors maintained by attempting to get away from instructional demands as it reduces the frequency of giving the student a reinforcer following an FCR while increasing a student’s tolerance for task completion (Davis et al, 2018; Suess et al, 2014).…”
Section: Teaching Students To Tolerate Delays To Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%