Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich-clubs

Abstract

The large-scale structural ingredients of the brain and neural connectomes have been identified in recent years. These are, similar to the features found in many other real networks: the arrangement of brain regions into modules and the presence of highly connected regions (hubs) forming rich-clubs. Here, we examine how modules and hubs shape the collective dynamics on networks and we find that both ingredients lead to the emergence of complex dynamics. Comparing the connectomes of C. elegans, cats, macaques and humans to surrogate networks in which either modules or hubs are destroyed, we find that functional complexity always decreases in the perturbed networks. A comparison between simulated and empirically obtained resting-state functional connectivity indicates that the human brain, at rest, lies in a dynamical state that reflects the largest complexity its anatomical connectome can host. Last, we generalise the topology of neural connectomes into a new hierarchical network model that successfully combines modular organisation with rich-club forming hubs. This is achieved by centralising the cross-modular connections through a preferential attachment rule. Our network model hosts more complex dynamics than other hierarchical models widely used as benchmarks.

Revealing in-block nestedness: Detection and benchmarking

“…This finding suggests that previous works may have overlooked important features when discussing the organization of real systems and connects with previous works in diverse areas, such as network neuroscience [47,48]. The existence of in-block nested structures affects the debate around population dynamics, in ecology especially, in terms of which patterns maximize survival [5] and why.…”

MOU-EC: model-based whole-brain effective connectivity to extract biomarkers for brain dynamics from fMRI data and study distributed cognition

“…In parallel to integration, the concept of complexity has been often used to differentiate brain 635 states [143,142,7,156]. Intuitively, complexity measures quantify the diversity of organizational motifs in a network, in the range of interest between the trivial extremes of full disconnectivity and full connectivity.…”

“…Building biomarkers that capture network effects is important to make use of the multivariate nature of the fMRI data. This is important when interpreting data in terms of concepts such as integration, segregation and complexity [142,43,42,156]. An interesting direction for future work is the study of directional properties of the flow, especially in the characterization fo functional communities.…”

Dynamical informational structures characterize the different human brain states of wakefulness and deep sleep

“…Different measures of the dynamic complexity of a network have been proposed. For instance in 88 , given a network its pair-wise correlation matrix reflects the degree of interdependencies among the nodes. When the nodes are disconnected or close to independence (equivalent to a small g), no complex collective dynamics emerge and the distribution of cross-correlation values are characterized by a narrow peak close to low values.…”