2011
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectivity between amygdala and facial regions involved in recognition of facial threat

Abstract: The recognition of threatening faces is important for making social judgments. For example, threatening facial features of defendants could affect the decisions of jurors during a trial. Previous neuroimaging studies using faces of members of the general public have identified a pivotal role of the amygdala in perceiving threat. This functional magnetic resonance imaging study used face photographs of male prisoners who had been convicted of first-degree murder (MUR) as threatening facial stimuli. We compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the brain stem is assumed as part of an alert system that rapidly detects subliminal cues of threat and initiates adequate motoric responses, such as fight/flight behavior (Liddell et al, 2005), functional connectivity between the amygdala and the fusiform gyrus shows associations with perceived threat from facial expressions (Miyahara et al, 2013). Our findings therefore suggest that oxytocin may reduce social threat perception from the eye region under conditions of limited awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Whereas the brain stem is assumed as part of an alert system that rapidly detects subliminal cues of threat and initiates adequate motoric responses, such as fight/flight behavior (Liddell et al, 2005), functional connectivity between the amygdala and the fusiform gyrus shows associations with perceived threat from facial expressions (Miyahara et al, 2013). Our findings therefore suggest that oxytocin may reduce social threat perception from the eye region under conditions of limited awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…98,99 The FFA also receives “back projections” from brain regions implicated in affective processing, which are thought to bias responding towards emotionally salient or arousing facial expressions. 100,10136 Thus, among the girls in our sample with LOC eating, heightened engagement of FFA may reflect a bias towards processing negative feedback from high-value peers. This bias, which emerged during only the most threatening of social encounters (negative feedback from high-value peers), also was positively associated with consumption during the test meal in those with LOC eating.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, the neuropathology underlying this impairment is unclear. A network of brain regions critical for facial affect recognition have been identified) and include the prefrontal cortex (i.e., ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex), limbic structures (i.e., amygdala, temporal lobes and fusiform gyrus, and regions of the parietal lobe) (Adolphs, 2010;Miyahara, Harada, Ruffman, Sadato, & Iidaka, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%