2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectivity explains how neuronavigated TMS of posterior temporal subregions differentially affect language processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive areas, located mainly in the pSTG in the non‐PLA group, may represent the classical language area. Several fMRI studies using naming tasks in healthy individuals have demonstrated that the left pSTG activation was robust and that the SMG activation was limited (Gkiatis et al, 2022 ; Smitha et al, 2017 ; Vasileiadi et al, 2023 ). Therefore, we speculate that the relatively wider distribution of language areas that include the areas around the pSMG reported in previous studies on DES reflects functional reorganization in patients with tumors in the PLA (Sarubbo et al, 2020 ; Tate et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positive areas, located mainly in the pSTG in the non‐PLA group, may represent the classical language area. Several fMRI studies using naming tasks in healthy individuals have demonstrated that the left pSTG activation was robust and that the SMG activation was limited (Gkiatis et al, 2022 ; Smitha et al, 2017 ; Vasileiadi et al, 2023 ). Therefore, we speculate that the relatively wider distribution of language areas that include the areas around the pSMG reported in previous studies on DES reflects functional reorganization in patients with tumors in the PLA (Sarubbo et al, 2020 ; Tate et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have done so in object naming, yet a distinction between items has yet to be made. Qualitative analysis of errors has been performed after stimulating the cortex or the white matter tracts (anomia, semantic paraphasia, phonological paraphasia (e.g., Hernandez-Pavon et al, 2014 ; Vasileiadi et al, 2023 ), however; no attention has been paid to the actual name requested behind the errors. A retrospective analysis in that line for any TMS study done so far could be a simple and informative advance.…”
Section: Increasing the Sensibility Of The Explorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), by mimicking lesions through temporary and precisely noninvasive stimulation, provides a valuable alternative for assessing rapid adaptation. Elucidating the potential for flexible adaptation, a widespread mechanism in brain networks, can gain crucial insights into the functional specificity and interactions between the dorsal and ventral pathways in visual word recognition (Vasileiadi et al, 2023). Inhibitory TMS over the left IPL demonstrated delayed responses in phonological tasks and reduced activation in the bilateral supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and frontal operculum (Hartwigsen et al, 2010, 2017), while the inhibitory stimulation of the left ATL led to maladaptive changes in semantic performance (Ueno et al, 2018; Woollams et al, 2017), functional activation and connectivity of the left ATL accompanied by increased right ATL activation (Jung & Lambon Ralph, 2016, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%