Please cite this paper as: Tu FF, As-Sanie S. A modest proposal to investigate chronic uterine pain. BJOG 2017;124:182-184. In female pelvic pain evaluation and management, gynaecologists still lack precise methods to determine when the uterus is the primary problem. Patients with chronic pain often experience futility when seeking specific and explicit diagnostic labels for their distress. A dizzying array of supporting sources competes to advise them: the lay press, internet support sites and, all too often, cursory, balkanised initial evaluation by clinicians (ambulatory and in urgent care settings). In fact, the evidencebase proving that leiomyoma-, adenomyosis-or even endometriosis-associated uterine pain are always stable constructs over time remains distressingly small. This is particularly the case in patients with daily chronic symptoms. Hysterectomy in many cases provides a durable solution where leiomyoma, an island of adenomyosis, or a block of dense scar from a uterosacral endometriotic nodule is found in the final pathology report. Yet, there are frequent counterexamples where pain symptoms persist postoperatively despite removal of pelvic pathology. What tools might help determine when uterine surgery will be helpful? Validated clinical assessments for the presence of uterine pain on examination, and physiological studies of abnormal patterns of uterine blood flow or myometrial contractility could prove helpful but would need systematic study in larger cohorts of women. To jump start this process, we wish to make a modest proposal-that the gynecology field deliberately define and validate a diagnostic construct known as chronic uterine pain within the International Association for the Study of Pain's (IASP) Taxonomy of Pain umbrella termchronic pelvic pain syndromes (CPP). 1 This philosophical reappraisal could accelerate adoption of an overarching, symptom-and exam-based approach to CPP disorders. Deliberate attention to consistent subtypes of CPP based on symptoms and location of pain, complementing histologic and imaging defined features, could refine how to select appropriate hormonal, neurological, and procedural treatments. 2 Given that only about two dozen small treatment trials for nonspecific CPP have been published and generally only have employed counselling, manual therapy, or psychoactive medications, the opportunity for progress is large. 3