2021
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectivity of the hippocampus and its subfields in resting‐state networks

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

14
38
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(139 reference statements)
14
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the structural and functional data together, the results reported here suggest that PA is associated with structural changes in the subiculum and CA1 subfields, and with functional changes in middle/posterior and anterior hippocampal clusters related to the default mode and somatomotor network, respectively. These observations make sense in light of previous high-spatial resolution functional connectivity studies (Ezama et al, 2021;Dalton et al, 2019;de Flores et al, 2017). These studies have shown that regions of the default mode network reliably co-activate with the presubiculum and subiculum subfields of the middle/posterior hippocampus, and that regions of the somatomotor network co-activate with the CA1 and CA3 regions of the anterior hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Taking the structural and functional data together, the results reported here suggest that PA is associated with structural changes in the subiculum and CA1 subfields, and with functional changes in middle/posterior and anterior hippocampal clusters related to the default mode and somatomotor network, respectively. These observations make sense in light of previous high-spatial resolution functional connectivity studies (Ezama et al, 2021;Dalton et al, 2019;de Flores et al, 2017). These studies have shown that regions of the default mode network reliably co-activate with the presubiculum and subiculum subfields of the middle/posterior hippocampus, and that regions of the somatomotor network co-activate with the CA1 and CA3 regions of the anterior hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In terms of the functional connectivity of the hippocampus with the rest of the brain, most previous studies have examined how PA affected the relationship between the hippocampus and the default mode network (Tao et al, 2016;Ikuta et al, 2019;Prakash et al, 2011;Esteban-Cornejo et al, 2021;Voss, Erickson, et al, 2010;Voss, Prakash, et al, 2010;Voss et al, 2016;Burdette et al, 2010;Boraxbekk et al, 2016;Weng et al, 2017). However, it is well-known that the hippocampus co-activates with at least two different whole-brain resting-state networks (Ezama et al, 2021;Kahn et al, 2008;Ranganath & Ritchey, 2012;Vincent et al, 2006). For example, Ezama et al (2021) found that during the resting-state, anterior sections of the hippocampus coactivated with brain regions typically associated with the somatomotor network, whereas middle/posterior sections of the hippocampus co-activated with brain regions typically associated with the default mode network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations