2021
DOI: 10.5194/bg-18-2379-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional convergence of biosphere–atmosphere interactions in response to meteorological conditions

Abstract: Abstract. Understanding the dependencies of the terrestrial carbon and water cycle with meteorological conditions is a prerequisite to anticipate their behaviour under climate change conditions. However, terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere interact via a multitude of variables across temporal and spatial scales. Additionally these interactions might differ among vegetation types or climatic regions. Today, novel algorithms aim to disentangle the causal structure behind such interactions from empirical da… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The undisturbed forest, which is likely to be taller, with higher LAI and carbon stocks, would probably have higher maximum photosynthetic rates and net ecosystem production, which are the most important variables loading on the first axis. Although, in time, the variability of climate controls the variability of gross and net CO 2 uptake and productivity 14 , 15 , which are variables related to the maximum productivity axis (PC1), in space (that is, across sites) we find only a marginal control in very cold and radiation-limited sites (Extended Data Fig. 5a for a PC1 map), or for very warm and high atmospheric aridity (high VPD) conditions (Extended Data Fig.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The undisturbed forest, which is likely to be taller, with higher LAI and carbon stocks, would probably have higher maximum photosynthetic rates and net ecosystem production, which are the most important variables loading on the first axis. Although, in time, the variability of climate controls the variability of gross and net CO 2 uptake and productivity 14 , 15 , which are variables related to the maximum productivity axis (PC1), in space (that is, across sites) we find only a marginal control in very cold and radiation-limited sites (Extended Data Fig. 5a for a PC1 map), or for very warm and high atmospheric aridity (high VPD) conditions (Extended Data Fig.…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3b), the relatively lower ∆𝑇 could have been caused by a higher evaporative cooling enhanced by water availability (Yi et al, 2020). This points out that the thermal balance of forests is more constrained by the background climatic conditions than by the functional group dominating the ecosystem; the higher dependency of biosphere-atmosphere interactions on background climate over functional groups was recently found across multiple ecosystems (Krich et al, 2021).…”
Section: Biotic Controls On Forest ∆𝑇mentioning
confidence: 88%