Functional convergence underground? The scale-dependency of community assembly processes in European cave spiders

Abstract

Understanding how species assemble into communities is a central tenet in ecology. One of the most elusive questions is the relative contribution of environmental filtering versus limiting similarity. Important advances in this area have been achieved by looking at communities through a functional lens (i.e., the traits they express), so as to derive principles valid across species pools. Yet, even using traits in lieu of taxonomy, the issue remains controversial because i) environmental filtering and limiting similarity often act simultaneously in shaping communities; and ii) their effect is scale-dependent. We exploited the experimental arena offered by caves, island-like natural laboratories characterized by largely constant environmental gradients and a limited diversity of species and interactions. Leveraging uniquely available data on distribution and traits for European cave spiders, we tested explicit hypotheses about variations in community assembly rules across ecological gradients and scales. We demonstrate that environmental filtering and limiting similarity shape cave communities acting on trait evolution in opposing directions. These effects are strongly scale dependent, varying along multiple environmental gradients. Conversely, the effect of geography on trait composition is weak, indicating that trait turnover in space happens primarily by substitution of species pursuing similar functions due to strong environmental filters. Our findings reconcile contrasted views about the relative importance of the two main mechanisms shaping patterns of biodiversity, and provide a conceptual foundation to account for scaling effects in the study of community assembly.

The what, how and why of trait-based analyses in ecology

“…For example, evolutionary mechanisms can vary through time or per clades (and so patterns are often the results of multiple processes); or ecological mechanisms are often intertwined and work together to generate a pattern (e.g. facilitation + competition; Danet et al 2024), or counteract each others by operating on the trait space in opposite directions (e.g., competition + filtering; Mammola et al 2024)…”