2022
DOI: 10.1172/jci163175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional cure of hepatitis B requires silencing covalently closed circular and integrated hepatitis B virus DNA

Abstract: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major global health problem. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss has been accepted as the definition of a functional HBV cure. Recent studies found that while covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) is the predominant source of HBsAg in hepatitis B e antigen–positive (HBeAg-positive) patients, integrated HBV DNA (iDNA) is the main source in HBeAg-negative patients. Consequently, achieving a functional HBV cure will require not only silencing of cccDNA bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has not been a substantial HBsAg reduction reported to date in CHB patients treated with either RG7907 or GLS4, despite both compounds strongly reduce serum HBV DNA and HBV RNA levels ( 18 20 ). This is likely due, at least in part, to the production of HBsAg from HBV-integrated cells, which do not express HBc and therefore are not expected to be susceptible to CAM-A treatment ( 34 , 35 ). Our study provides an additional explanation for the discrepancy in preclinical and clinical efficacy of CAM-A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has not been a substantial HBsAg reduction reported to date in CHB patients treated with either RG7907 or GLS4, despite both compounds strongly reduce serum HBV DNA and HBV RNA levels ( 18 20 ). This is likely due, at least in part, to the production of HBsAg from HBV-integrated cells, which do not express HBc and therefore are not expected to be susceptible to CAM-A treatment ( 34 , 35 ). Our study provides an additional explanation for the discrepancy in preclinical and clinical efficacy of CAM-A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%