2006
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.10.4.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Degrees of Freedom

Abstract: Mechanical degrees of freedom (DOF) are defined as the minimum number of independent coordinates needed to describe a system's position. The human musculoskeletal system has many mechanical DOF through which countless movements are accomplished. In the motor control field, one of the aspirations is to understand how the many DOF are organized for movement execution-the so-called DOF problem. Natural movements are characterized by the coordination of the DOF such that few vary independently. The concept of func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neuromuscular input allows DOF 'freezing' through segmental coupling, providing a reduced subset of control units described using functional DOF (James & Bates, 1997;Li, 2006) and synergies, though the number of mechanical DOF does not change (Chvatal & Ting, 2012;Diedrichsen, Shadmehr, & Ivry, 2009;Todorov, 2006;Turvey, 1990). Mathematically, synergies are defined by systematic correlations among effectors (muscles, joints, or limbs), which characterize coordinated movement (Diedrichsen et al, 2009;Latash, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuromuscular input allows DOF 'freezing' through segmental coupling, providing a reduced subset of control units described using functional DOF (James & Bates, 1997;Li, 2006) and synergies, though the number of mechanical DOF does not change (Chvatal & Ting, 2012;Diedrichsen, Shadmehr, & Ivry, 2009;Todorov, 2006;Turvey, 1990). Mathematically, synergies are defined by systematic correlations among effectors (muscles, joints, or limbs), which characterize coordinated movement (Diedrichsen et al, 2009;Latash, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a technique has emerged that is capable of decomposing EMG patterns recorded from numerous muscles into the summed activation of just a few muscle synergies (Ting and McKay 2007;Tresch et al 1999). Muscle synergies represent the global temporal and spatial organization of the motor output (Li 2006) and provide an attractive simplified strategy for the control of complex movements because they reduce the number of output patterns that the nervous system must specify for a large number of muscles (Raasch and Zajac 1999). For example, five muscle synergies account for the majority of variability in the surface EMG signals of 32 muscles during walking ) and running (Cappellini et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The functional degrees of freedom (DOFs) in these movements are two, one for each joint (Li 2006). This system is relevant in many functional tasks and has been investigated in several rehabilitation strategies for recovery of function (e.g., Popovic et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%