“…There were no significant group differences: group, F(2, 16) = 0.216, p = 0.808; Session 3 Group interaction, F(12, 96) = 0.700, p = 0.748; therefore, the data from these groups were collapsed into a single ''control'' group. Notably, even after 7 days of acquisition sessions, CR% in most rats did not reach the previously reported asymptote for trace eyeblink conditioning with a regular 500-ms trace interval in rats ($60%; Weiss et al, 1999;Beylin et al, 2001;Morrissey et al, 2012). These results suggest that extending the trace interval by 250 ms effectively weakened the animal's ability to associate the CS and US.…”