2021
DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Ensemble Survival Tree: Dynamic Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease Progression Accommodating Multiple Time-Varying Covariates

Abstract: With the exponential growth in data collection, multiple time‐varying biomarkers are commonly encountered in clinical studies, along with a rich set of baseline covariates. This paper is motivated by addressing a critical issue in the field of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in which we aim to predict the time for AD conversion in people with mild cognitive impairment to inform prevention and early treatment decisions. Conventional joint models of biomarker trajectory with time‐to‐event data rely heavily on model ass… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, 2008; Jiang et al. , 2021) as shown in one of our simulation studies. Other radiomic feature‐based methods such as deep neural networks can also be adopted (Wu et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, 2008; Jiang et al. , 2021) as shown in one of our simulation studies. Other radiomic feature‐based methods such as deep neural networks can also be adopted (Wu et al.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While we have proposed using the proportional hazards model in this article, our modeling framework can be directly extended to other types of survival setups. For instance, the features extracted from the proposed methods can be directly used under the random survival forest (Ishwaran et al, 2008;Jiang et al, 2021) as shown in one of our simulation studies. Other radiomic featurebased methods such as deep neural networks can also be adopted (Wu et al, 2019;McKinney et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing accurate predictions of health events that can exploit all the available individual information, even measured repeatedly over time, has become a major issue with the expansion of precise medicine. After the first proposals of dynamic predictions from repeated marker information [1,6], some authors have recently begun to tackle the problem of large dimension of longitudinal markers [18,19,22]. In comparison with this recent literature, our method has the advantage of (i) considering any nature of markers with measurement error while other considered only continuous outcomes [19], (ii) proposing the use of many summaries from the biomarkers as individual posterior computation from the longitudinal model (compared for instance to [22] who only include one or two summaries), (iii) exploiting the time-continuous information from survival data rather than discretized scale as in [22], and (iv) considering a vast variety of machine learning techniques as well as a superlearner rather than focusing only on one specific technique [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computing dynamic predictions in the context of a large number of repeated markers is a very new topic in statistics, and only a few proposals have been made very recently. Zhao et al [18] and Jiang et al [19] focused on random forests. Using a landmark approach, Zhao et al transformed the survival data into pseudo-observations and incorporated in each tree the marker information at a randomly selected time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing accurate predictions of health events that can exploit all the available individual information, even measured repeatedly over time, has become a major issue with the expansion of precise medicine. After the first proposals of dynamic predictions from repeated marker information [1,6], some authors have recently began to tackle the problem of large dimension of longitudinal markers [22,18,19]. In comparison with this recent literature, our method has the advantage of (i) considering any nature of markers with measurement error while other considered only continuous outcomes [19], (ii) proposing the use of many summaries from the biomarkers as individual posterior computation from the longitudinal model (compared for instance to [22] who only include one or two summaries), (iii) exploits the time-continuous information from survival data rather than discretized scale as in [22], and (iv) considering a vast variety of machine learning techniques as well as a superlearner rather than focusing only on one specific technique [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%