2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.anpede.2021.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional gastrointestinal disorders frequency by Rome IV criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FD was the second most common prevalent FGIDs among participants of the current study, where 5% of the recruited samples fulfilled the Rome IV criteria of FD. These findings support a previous study result, where the incidence of FD in children was between 3% and 27% ( 26 , 27 ). Altered visceral sensation, Helicobacter pylori infection, and gastrointestinal motor abnormalities have all been identified as major pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of FD ( 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…FD was the second most common prevalent FGIDs among participants of the current study, where 5% of the recruited samples fulfilled the Rome IV criteria of FD. These findings support a previous study result, where the incidence of FD in children was between 3% and 27% ( 26 , 27 ). Altered visceral sensation, Helicobacter pylori infection, and gastrointestinal motor abnormalities have all been identified as major pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of FD ( 28 , 29 ).…”
Section: Disscusionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…22 In another study conducted in Spain, 29% functional abdominal pain, 28.4% functional dyspepsia and 16.8% functional constipation were found in children over 4 years of age. 23 According to the results of a study evaluating the prevalence of FGID in children and adolescents, the most common FGID seen in both children and adolescents is functional constipation (14.1%). 24 The nding that functional constipation is the most common FGID in children and adolescents over the age of 4 years was consistent with the data of Robin et al, (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] This suggested that the problem in the patients included in the present study was not fecal impaction but rather a motility issue affecting all intestinal segments, similar to slow-transit constipation. [12,13] Thus, unlike previous studies, we calculated the rectosigmoid ratio by measuring the transverse diameters of the rectum and sigmoid colon using ultrasound in our study patients. [11] Consequently, it was found that the rectosigmoid index was <1 before treatment, but it showed signi cant improvement and increased to ≥1 after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%