2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.18.423291
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional idiosyncrasy has a shared topography with group-level connectivity alterations in autism

Abstract: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is commonly understood as a network disorder, yet case-control analyses against typically-developing controls (TD) have yielded somewhat inconsistent patterns of results. The current work was centered on a novel approach to profile functional network idiosyncrasy, the inter-individual variability in the association between functional network organization and brain anatomy, and we tested the hypothesis that idiosyncrasy contributes to connectivity alterations in ASD. Studying func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural connectome was built by mapping the reconstructed cross-section streamlines onto the Schaefer 7-network based atlas with 200 parcels (Schaefer et al, 2018) then log-transformed to adjust for the scale (Fornito et al, 2016). We opted for this atlas as it (i) allows contextualization of our findings within macroscale intrinsic functional communities (Yeo et al, 2011), (ii) incorporates the option to assess results across different granularities, and (iii) aligns the current study with previous work from our group (Benkarim et al, 2020; Paquola et al, 2020; Park et al, 2021, 2020a; Rodríguez-Cruces et al, 2020) and others (Baum et al, 2020; Betzel et al, 2019; Osmanlıoğlu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural connectome was built by mapping the reconstructed cross-section streamlines onto the Schaefer 7-network based atlas with 200 parcels (Schaefer et al, 2018) then log-transformed to adjust for the scale (Fornito et al, 2016). We opted for this atlas as it (i) allows contextualization of our findings within macroscale intrinsic functional communities (Yeo et al, 2011), (ii) incorporates the option to assess results across different granularities, and (iii) aligns the current study with previous work from our group (Benkarim et al, 2020; Paquola et al, 2020; Park et al, 2021, 2020a; Rodríguez-Cruces et al, 2020) and others (Baum et al, 2020; Betzel et al, 2019; Osmanlıoğlu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural connectome was built by mapping the reconstructed cross-section streamlines onto the Schaefer 7-network based atlas with 200 parcels (Schaefer et al, 2018) then log-transformed to adjust for the scale (Fornito et al, 2016). We opted for this atlas as it (i) allows contextualization of our findings within macroscale intrinsic functional communities (Yeo et al, 2011), (ii) incorporates the option to assess results across different granularities, and (iii) aligns the current study with previous work from our group (Benkarim et al, 2020;Paquola et al, 2020;Park et al, 2021Park et al, , 2020aRodríguez-Cruces et al, 2020) and others (Baum et al, 2020;Betzel et al, 2019;Osmanlıoğlu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Structural Connectome Manifold Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduce the abagen toolbox, an open-access software package designed to streamline processing and preparation of the AHBA for integration with neuroimaging data , available at https: //github.com/rmarkello/abagen). Supporting several workflows, abagen offers functionality for an array of analyses and has already been used in several peerreviewed publications and preprints (Benkarim et al 2020, Ding et al 2021, Hansen et al 2021, Lariviere et al 2020, Martins et al 2021, 2020, 2020, Valk et al 2021, Zhao et al 2020. The primary workflow, used to generate regional gene expression matrices, integrates 17 distinct processing steps that have previously been employed by research groups throughout the published literature (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creation of the toolbox has followed best-practices in software development, including version control, continuous integration testing, and modular code design. abagen has already been successfully used in many peer-reviewed publications (Benkarim et al 2020, Ding et al 2021, Hansen et al 2021, Lariviere et al 2020, Martins et al 2021, 2020, 2020, Valk et al 2021, Zhao et al 2020), and we continue to integrate new features as community needs emerge. To encourage further use by new research groups we provide comprehensive documentation on installing and working with the abagen toolbox online (https://abagen.readthedocs.io/).…”
Section: Standardized Processing and Reporting With The Abagen Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%