1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1042-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Integrals for Correlated Electrons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, π/a 0 ) and found that our RPA expressions for the spin stiffnesses and susceptibilities reduce to those previously obtained in Refs. [42,43]. We have also shown that the hydrodynamic expression for the magnon velocity c s = J/χ ⊥ does not hold in presence of gapless fermionic excitations, and it must be replaced by c s = J/χ ⊥ dyn .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, π/a 0 ) and found that our RPA expressions for the spin stiffnesses and susceptibilities reduce to those previously obtained in Refs. [42,43]. We have also shown that the hydrodynamic expression for the magnon velocity c s = J/χ ⊥ does not hold in presence of gapless fermionic excitations, and it must be replaced by c s = J/χ ⊥ dyn .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In the simpler case of perfect nesting, that is, when ξ k = −ξ k+Q , corresponding to the half-filled particle-hole symmetric Hubbard model, and at zero temperature, expressions for J and χ ⊥ have been derived in Refs. [42,43] for two spatial dimensions, and it is straightforward to check that our results reduce to these in this limit. Moreover, Eqs.…”
Section: F Néel Limitmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the simpler case of perfect nesting, that is, when ξ k = −ξ k+Q , corresponding to the half-filled particle-hole symmetric Hubbard model, and at zero temperature, expressions for J and χ ⊥ have been derived in Refs. [36,183] for two spatial dimensions, and it is straightforward to check that our results reduce to these in this limit. Moreover, Eqs.…”
Section: Néel Limitmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…To separate collective spin fluctuations from the charge degrees of freedom, we fractionalize the electronic fields as [36,37,65,183]…”
Section: Fractionalizing the Electron Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this Letter, we include the x and y channels as well. In the t 2 → 0 limit, the model retains the full spin rotation symmetry, and this should be reflected in our choice of interaction representation [30]. The symmetric decomposition η 0 = 1/8, η x,y,z = −1/8 yields the largest symmetry group SU (2) of the interaction such that…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%