2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Interplay between the Jaw Domain of Bacterial RNA Polymerase and Allele-specific Residues in the Product RNA-binding Pocket

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wild-type ECs and reduced F937–736 ECs synthesized the 78-nt RNA in 2–6 s at 37°C, 1 mM each NTP, suggesting an average transcription rate of 7–20 s −1 . This slower overall rate relative to the single- or double-turnover assays (Figure 2; 17) is comparable to prior observations for processive transcription under similar conditions (42,43) and reflects template positions at which translocation or catalysis may be slower than GTP addition on Scaffold GTP or at which pausing occurs. In reactions containing crosslinked F937–736 ECs, a distinct, slower elongating species is evident (red boxes, Supplementary Figure S1) with an average elongation rate of ∼1 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Wild-type ECs and reduced F937–736 ECs synthesized the 78-nt RNA in 2–6 s at 37°C, 1 mM each NTP, suggesting an average transcription rate of 7–20 s −1 . This slower overall rate relative to the single- or double-turnover assays (Figure 2; 17) is comparable to prior observations for processive transcription under similar conditions (42,43) and reflects template positions at which translocation or catalysis may be slower than GTP addition on Scaffold GTP or at which pausing occurs. In reactions containing crosslinked F937–736 ECs, a distinct, slower elongating species is evident (red boxes, Supplementary Figure S1) with an average elongation rate of ∼1 s −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…with a study suggesting a genetic link between residues in the β′ jaw and the active site of the RNAP (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A functional interplay between the β′ jaw and other mobile modules of the RNAP is not without precedent. A recent report by Ederth et al 18 suggests that the β′ jaw has an effect on the active centre of the RNAP through interactions with an active centre-proximal mobile element referred to as the β′ trigger loop. Thus, in light of our current results with the β′ clamp mutant Eσ 54 , it seems reasonable to propose that the contribution of the β′ jaw to open promoter complex stability involves an interplay with the β′ clamp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%