2020
DOI: 10.5114/hpr.2020.92718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional lateralization of tool-sound and action-word processing in a bilingual brain

Abstract: health psychology report • volume 8(1),  original article background The impact of bilingualism on lateralized brain functions such as praxis -the control of skilled actions -and language representations themselves, particularly in the auditory domain, is still largely unknown. Recent studies suggest that bilingualism affects both basic (fundamental frequency) sound and action-related speech processing. Whether it can impact non-verbal action sound processing is a question of debate. participants and proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(136 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, our results indicate that the specific stimulation site of our choice, located in a rather anterior subdivision of the left SMG, plays a causal role in such highly complex arithmetic as discount price calculations. The greater engagement of left SMG, as compared to the right one, is consistent with a notion that this subdivision of PPC is also a part of the praxis representation network (PRN) for representing and sequencing highly complex and skilled actions in the typical brain ( Przybylski and Kroliczak, 2017 ; see also Klichowski et al, 2020 ). After all, mathematical cognition is often linked to skilled manual/finger operations, and thus praxis ( Rugani et al, 2017 ; Ras et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Importantly, our results indicate that the specific stimulation site of our choice, located in a rather anterior subdivision of the left SMG, plays a causal role in such highly complex arithmetic as discount price calculations. The greater engagement of left SMG, as compared to the right one, is consistent with a notion that this subdivision of PPC is also a part of the praxis representation network (PRN) for representing and sequencing highly complex and skilled actions in the typical brain ( Przybylski and Kroliczak, 2017 ; see also Klichowski et al, 2020 ). After all, mathematical cognition is often linked to skilled manual/finger operations, and thus praxis ( Rugani et al, 2017 ; Ras et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It should be carried out with the use of research tools measuring not only behavioral effects, as in our study, but also with techniques such as neuroimaging or other methods in the field of cognitive neuroscience. Such research may not only enable – as in the case of our study – showing the practical consequences of using educational balls but also develop a theory concerning the relationship between gross motor activity and mathematical cognition, which is still not so well studied ( Ras et al, 2019 ; Klichowski et al, 2020 ; Klichowski and Kroliczak, 2020 ). Without a doubt, it is also necessary to conduct further, more thorough studies into Eduball’s influence on children’s mathematical development that will involve participants of other age and cultural groups and use other experimental procedures, as well as skill tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It seems that using Eduball in the classroom would also require a miniaturization of these educational balls. We are currently developing a prototype of this type of mini-Eduball (the size of a tennis ball), which, by integrating cognitive activity with fine motor tasks, can offer even greater benefits than “big” Eduballs, as neural correlates of fine motor skills are much more closely related to language or numeracy neural circuits, compared to neural underpinnings of gross motor abilities ( Bidula et al, 2017 ; Klichowski and Kroliczak, 2017 , 2020 ; Przybylski and Kroliczak, 2017 ; Styrkowiec et al, 2019 ; Klichowski et al, 2020 ; Kroliczak et al, 2020 ; for the most recent evidences, see Kroliczak et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%