Functional magnetic resonance study of deliberate deception

Abstract

The goal of the study was analysis of the cerebral mechanisms of deliberate deception. The event related functional magnetic resonance (ER fMRI) imaging technique was used to assess the changes in the functional brain activity by means of recording the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal. Twelve right handed healthy volunteers aged 19-44 years participated in the study. The BOLD images were obtained during three experimental trials: deliberate deception, manipulative honest and control truthful trials (catch trials). The deliberate deception and manipulative honest actions were characterized by a BOLD signal increase in the anterior cingulate (Brodmann's area (BA) 32), frontal (BAs 9/10, 6), and parietal (BA 40) cor tices as compared with a truthful response. Comparison of the ER fMRI data with the results of earlier studies where event related potentials (ERPs) were recorded under similar conditions indicates the involvement of the brain mechanism of error detection in deliberate deception.

The Influence of Explicit Emotional Information on the Inhibition Process of Deceptive Response: Evidence from ERP

“…Deception in real life is not only a process of error response, but also involves a lot of complex social situations, trade-offs and interpersonal relationships. Of course, there are many psychological processes, such as emotion, attention, memory and decision when making trade-offs (Kireev et al,2012).…”

Functional Connectivity Pattern Analysis Underlying Neural Oscillation Synchronization during Deception

“…Therefore, in contrast to truthful responses, deception involves the activation of several brain regions, including the temporal and occipital lobes and frontal and parietal scalp regions [2, 7–11]. Furthermore, the prefrontal cortex, including areas of the anterior cingulate cortex, middle frontal gyrus, and inferior frontal gyrus, is usually related to decision-making, action inhibition, and conflict monitoring, which are assumed to regulate deception [3, 12, 13]. At the neural circuit level, the connectivities related to the frontal and parietal networks play crucial roles in the processing of deception [14].…”

Deception Detection Using Neuroimaging

“…A. Bhatt, Lohrenz, Camerer, & Montague, 2010;S. Bhatt et al, 2009;Browndyke et al, 2008;Davatzikos et al, 2005;Fullam, McKie, & Dolan, 2009;Gamer, Bauermann, Stoeter, & Vossel, 2007;Gamer, Klimecki, Bauermann, Stoeter, & Vossel, 2012;Ganis, Kosslyn, Stose, Thompson, & Yurgelun-Todd, 2003;Ganis, Rosenfeld, Meixner, Kievit, & Schendan, 2011;Ganis et al, 2009;Hakun et al, 2009;Ito et al, 2011Ito et al, , 2012Jin et al, 2009;Kaylor-Hughes et al, 2011;Kireev, Korotkov, & Medvedev, 2012;Kozel, Johnson, Grenesko et al, 2009;Kozel, Johnson, Laken, et al, 2009;Kozel, Laken, et al, 2009;Kozel, Padgett, & George, 2004;Kozel et al, 2004;Kroliczak, Cavina-Pratesi, Goodman, & Culham, 2007;Langleben et al, 2002;Lee, Raine, & Chan, 2010;Lee et al, 2009;Lee et al, 2002;Lee et al, 2005;Liang et al, 2012;Marchewka et al, 2012;McPherson, McMahon, Wilson, & Copland, 2012;Mohamed et al, 2006;Monteleone et al, 2009;Nunez, Casey, Egner, Hare, & Hirsch, 2005;Phan et al, 2005;Sip et al, 2010;Spence, Kaylor-Hughes, Farrow, & Wilkinson, 2008;Spence et al, 2001). The focus of this chapter is on the technic...…”