1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90197-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional magnetic stimulation: A new modality for enhancing systemic fibrinolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MAS is extensively and reliably used in clinical practice and research to evaluate spasticity and is reported to have good validity in patients with chronic stroke. 24 The scale is graded in 6 stages (0, no increase in tone; 1, slightly increased tone, giving a catch/release or minimal resistance at the end range of motion [ROM]; 1 + , slightly increased tone, giving a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of the ROM; 2, more markedly increased tone through most of the ROM but affected part easily moved; 3, considerably increased tone and passive movement difficult; and 4, limb rigid in flexion or extension). For convenience of statistical analysis, MAS grade 1 + was point 2; grades 2, 3, and 4 were respectively matched to 3, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MAS is extensively and reliably used in clinical practice and research to evaluate spasticity and is reported to have good validity in patients with chronic stroke. 24 The scale is graded in 6 stages (0, no increase in tone; 1, slightly increased tone, giving a catch/release or minimal resistance at the end range of motion [ROM]; 1 + , slightly increased tone, giving a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of the ROM; 2, more markedly increased tone through most of the ROM but affected part easily moved; 3, considerably increased tone and passive movement difficult; and 4, limb rigid in flexion or extension). For convenience of statistical analysis, MAS grade 1 + was point 2; grades 2, 3, and 4 were respectively matched to 3, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many perturbation studies were designed to assess spasticity and instructed subjects to relax and not intervene or react to the perturbation [ 14 , 19 , 23 25 ]. Other studies have instructed subjects to actively assist [ 26 ] or actively resist [ 27 ] the perturbation. In these paradigms the applied perturbation directly controlled limb motion so that the subject could not actively achieve the behavioural goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spasticity will be evaluated using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) [ 23 ]. This scale has been validated for the evaluation of spasticity [ 24 , 25 ] and is sensitive to change following BTX-A treatment [ 26 ]. Lastly, strength of the hip extensor, flexor and abductor, knee flexor and extensor, ankle dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles of the affected and non-affected lower limbs will be measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale [ 27 , 28 ] (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Method/designmentioning
confidence: 99%