2015
DOI: 10.6000/2292-2598.2015.03.01.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Measurement of Special Education Teachers’ and Students’ Expectations Toward Job Training for Persons with Intellectual Disability

Abstract: Persons with intellectual disability (PWID) have fewer opportunities for enrolment in school programs and post-school employment than do their peers with typical development. Evidence suggests that attitude toward PWID is a main factor in either promoting or limiting better life conditions for this population. In this paper, the goal was to determine the cognitive information integration rules underlying the expectations of 174 special education teachers and students with regard to job training for PWID. In or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By considering this cognitive specification schema, this research aims to determine the way students take the decision to cheat by analysing psychological valuation (V) as well as to cognitively specify algebraic integration of information (I operator) in order to put under scrutiny the observed cheating behaviour (R). The cognitive algebra paradigm has been used to explore a variety of human behaviour domains (Castro, Morales, Lopez, Olivares, & Masip, 2018;Esterle, Munoz-Sastre, & Mullet, 2008;Falconi & Mullet, 2003;Herve, Mullet, & Sorum, 2004;Morales, 2012;Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, Esterle, Munoz-Sastre, & Mullet, 2010), including special education (e.g., Morales, Lopez, Villarreal-Trevino, Montalvo, Mezquita-Hoyos, & Castro-Sanchez, 2014), technical education for work settings (e.g., Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, Villarreal-Trevino, & Mezquita-Hoyos, 2015) and academic self-efficacy in middle education (e.g., Briones-Rodriguez, Morales-Martinez, Santos-Alcantara, Lopez-Ramirez, & Urdiales-Ibarra, 2016) and higher education (e.g., Villarreal-Trevino, Villarreal-Lozano, Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, & Flores-Moreno, 2017). However, academic dishonesty has never been explored from an IIT perspective, and the goal of this research is to introduce this approach in the field of academic dishonest behaviour by answering the question: What are the cognitive information integration mechanisms that might lead to academic cheating?…”
Section: Information Integration Theory As a Cognitive Methods For Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By considering this cognitive specification schema, this research aims to determine the way students take the decision to cheat by analysing psychological valuation (V) as well as to cognitively specify algebraic integration of information (I operator) in order to put under scrutiny the observed cheating behaviour (R). The cognitive algebra paradigm has been used to explore a variety of human behaviour domains (Castro, Morales, Lopez, Olivares, & Masip, 2018;Esterle, Munoz-Sastre, & Mullet, 2008;Falconi & Mullet, 2003;Herve, Mullet, & Sorum, 2004;Morales, 2012;Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, Esterle, Munoz-Sastre, & Mullet, 2010), including special education (e.g., Morales, Lopez, Villarreal-Trevino, Montalvo, Mezquita-Hoyos, & Castro-Sanchez, 2014), technical education for work settings (e.g., Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, Villarreal-Trevino, & Mezquita-Hoyos, 2015) and academic self-efficacy in middle education (e.g., Briones-Rodriguez, Morales-Martinez, Santos-Alcantara, Lopez-Ramirez, & Urdiales-Ibarra, 2016) and higher education (e.g., Villarreal-Trevino, Villarreal-Lozano, Morales-Martinez, Lopez-Ramirez, & Flores-Moreno, 2017). However, academic dishonesty has never been explored from an IIT perspective, and the goal of this research is to introduce this approach in the field of academic dishonest behaviour by answering the question: What are the cognitive information integration mechanisms that might lead to academic cheating?…”
Section: Information Integration Theory As a Cognitive Methods For Expmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cognitive algebraic rules are present in very diverse human life domains such as ethical behavior [23], love, sexuality, and intellectual disability [24], and human health [25]. In the educational field, there are studies on the cognitive algebra underlying attitudes towards school inclusion [26], job training for people with intellectual disabilities [27], the desire to cheat on exams [28], test anxiety [29], [30] and students' mathematical self-efficacy [31], [32]. In general, these studies indicate that participants make systematic judgments when evaluating school situations.…”
Section: Cognitive Algebra As a Valuable Tool To Explore The Cognitiv...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Mexico, special education teachers were found to use a summative cognitive rule to judge the probability that a person with an intellectual disability (ID) would be successfully integrated into mainstream education (Morales et al, 2014). On the other hand, they used a multiplicative cognitive rule to judge the probability that a person with ID could learn a skill through technical training (Morales et al, 2015).…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%