2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803161-2.00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Measurements of Central Nervous System Drug Effects in Early Human Drug Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcome of saccadic eye movement measurement is saccadic peak velocity (SPV) in degrees per second (deg/s), a sensitive parameter for numerous sedative compounds 4,15,16 . Tests were performed as described in previous publications 15–18 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The primary outcome of saccadic eye movement measurement is saccadic peak velocity (SPV) in degrees per second (deg/s), a sensitive parameter for numerous sedative compounds 4,15,16 . Tests were performed as described in previous publications 15–18 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome of saccadic eye movement measurement is saccadic peak velocity (SPV) in degrees per second (deg/s), a sensitive parameter for numerous sedative compounds. 4,15,16 Tests were performed as described in previous publications. [15][16][17][18] Subjects were instructed to follow a dot jumping approximately 15 degrees to either side on a computer screen with their eyes, while head movements were restrained using a fixed head support at 58 cm from the computer screen.…”
Section: Saccadic Eye Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previously, similar criteria were used to evaluate the usefulness of central nervous system (CNS)-tests for the effects of antipsychotic drugs ( De Visser et al, 2001 ), benzodiazepines ( De Visser et al, 2003 ), selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) ( Dumont et al, 2005 ), 3,4-methyleendioxymethamfetamine (MDMA) ( Dumont and Verkes, 2006 ), D9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) ( Zuurman et al, 2009 ) and alcohol ( Zoethout et al, 2011 ) in healthy subjects. In general, these systematic reviews showed that only a small number of tests actually display proper characteristics for a meaningful effect biomarker, and that these tests differ between drug classes ( Van Gerven et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%