1965
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1965.00760010581005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Mechanism of the Labyrinthine Epithelium: II. Author's Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the early published works [10,[16][17][18][19] the endolymph consists of the acid mucopolysaccharide molecules, which are considered as the long threads of the length about 0.5 mkm and the width about 4 nm. One of them most imported features is that they are getting polarized, being bent by the hits of surrounding water molecules submitted to the Brownian motion.…”
Section: Molecular Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the early published works [10,[16][17][18][19] the endolymph consists of the acid mucopolysaccharide molecules, which are considered as the long threads of the length about 0.5 mkm and the width about 4 nm. One of them most imported features is that they are getting polarized, being bent by the hits of surrounding water molecules submitted to the Brownian motion.…”
Section: Molecular Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the earlier published works (Jensen, 1954;Jensen, Koefoed, & Vilstrup, 1954;Carlsen, Dansgaard, & Jensen, 1959;Christiansen, 1963;Mygin, 1965) the endolymph consists of the acid mucopolysaccharide molecules, which are considered as the long threads of the length about 0.5 mkm and the width about 4 nm. One of them most imported features is that they are getting polarized, being bent by the hits of surrounding water molecules submitted to the Brownian motion.…”
Section: Molecular Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was written in 1966; however, the lesson was not heeded, for the publication of ill-informed theories of hearing still continues. The reason for von Bekesy's comments was a series of papers by Mygind (1966), who studied a large amount of fixed material of various ages and conditions derived from a wide variety of animal species. He concluded that a pressure receptor rather than a shearing force was the meaningful stimulus and that certain structures, e.g.…”
Section: Mechanics Of the Cochleamentioning
confidence: 99%