The mechanism of the proline-catalyzed aldol reaction has stimulated considerable debate, and despite limited experimental data, at least five different mechanisms have been proposed. Complementary to recent theoretical studies we have initiated an experimental program with the goal of clarifying some of the basic mechanistic questions concerning the proline-catalyzed aldol reaction. Here we summarize our discoveries in this area and provide further evidence for the involvement of enamine intermediates. D iscovered in the early 1970s, the Hajos-Parrish-EderSauer-Wiechert reaction (1, 2), a proline-catalyzed intramolecular aldol reaction, represents not only the first asymmetric aldol reaction invented by chemists but also the first highly enantioselective organocatalytic transformation [1(4) 3 2(5) 3 3(6)] (Eq. 1 of Scheme 1) (3-6). Inspired by Nature's phenomenal enzymes, which catalyze direct asymmetric aldolizations of unmodified carbonyl compounds (7, 8), we have recently extended the Hajos-Parrish-Eder-Sauer-Wiechert reaction to the first intermolecular variant (7 ϩ 8 3 9) (Eq. 2 of Scheme 1) (9), and to several other reactions including prolinecatalyzed asymmetric Mannich (10), Michael (11), ␣-amination (12), and intramolecular enolexo aldolization reactions (10 3 11) (13) (Eq. 3 of Scheme 1) (14-18).Similar to the aldolase enzymes, proline catalyzes direct asymmetric aldol reactions between two different carbonyl compounds to provide aldol products in excellent yields and enantioselectivities. Early on it has been speculated that in addition to operating on related substrates, both class I aldolases and proline may also share a similar enamine mechanism (19,20). However, there has been some debate over several mechanistic aspects of the reaction, and a number of alternative models have been proposed. For example, Hajos (1) suggested a mechanism that involves the ''activation'' of one of the enantiotopic acceptor carbonyl groups as a carbinol amine (A of Scheme 1). At least the stereochemistry of this model was questioned by Jung (19) soon after its initial proposal. An enamine mechanism was suggested by various groups already in the 1970s and 1980s (19-21). Nonlinearity studies by Agami and colleagues (21) have led to the proposal of a side-chain enamine mechanism that involves two proline molecules in the C-C-bondforming transition state, one engaged in enamine formation and the other as a proton transfer mediator (B of Scheme 1). Swaminathan et al. (22) favor a heterogeneous aldolization mechanism on the surface of crystalline proline (C of Scheme 1), despite the fact that many proline-catalyzed aldolizations are completely homogenous. Agami's widely accepted twoproline mechanism was recently challenged when we proposed a homogenous one-proline enamine mechanism for the intermolecular variant in which the various proton transfers are mediated by proline's carboxylic acid functionality (9). On the basis of density functional theory calculations, subsequently proposed a very similar mechanism for the in...