2000
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional MRI at 4.7 Tesla of the Rat Brain during Electric Stimulation of Forepaw, Hindpaw, or Tail in Single- and Multislice Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
48
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, although smaller magnitude activations were sometimes present outside the somatosensory pathway, they were unlikely the result of pain. Of note, in an fMRI study performed at 4.7 T, Spenger et al (2000) also report highly variable activations outside the somatosensory pathway (with no changes in MABP and HR) during forepaw stimulation in rats under α-chloralose anesthesia previously optimized to eliminate pain response to electrical stimulation. Second, isoflurane also depresses cerebrovascular reactivity to CO 2 relative to awake conditions (Sicard et al, 2003) which may explain the stronger hypercapnic challenges required to derive M. In animal studies, 5% and 10% CO 2 challenges are commonly used with other anesthetics (Luo et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2002), and the former is frequently used in human studies (Davis et al, 1998;Hoge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Potential Drawbacks Of the Isoflurane-anesthetized Forepaw-smentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, although smaller magnitude activations were sometimes present outside the somatosensory pathway, they were unlikely the result of pain. Of note, in an fMRI study performed at 4.7 T, Spenger et al (2000) also report highly variable activations outside the somatosensory pathway (with no changes in MABP and HR) during forepaw stimulation in rats under α-chloralose anesthesia previously optimized to eliminate pain response to electrical stimulation. Second, isoflurane also depresses cerebrovascular reactivity to CO 2 relative to awake conditions (Sicard et al, 2003) which may explain the stronger hypercapnic challenges required to derive M. In animal studies, 5% and 10% CO 2 challenges are commonly used with other anesthetics (Luo et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2002), and the former is frequently used in human studies (Davis et al, 1998;Hoge et al, 1999).…”
Section: Potential Drawbacks Of the Isoflurane-anesthetized Forepaw-smentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First, isoflurane suppresses neural activity which could explain the higher stimulation current needed relative to that used under α-chloralose (1.5-2.0 mA; Duong et al, 2000;Silva et al, 1999) which could potentially cause pain-induced changes in MABP and HR, as well as activation outside the somatosensory pathway. However, the applied current was previously optimized to elicit robust fMRI responses without producing sustained changes in MABP and HR which is interpreted as an absence of painful stimuli (Spenger et al, 2000). This anesthesia protocol used herein was also found to eliminate conscious response to noxious stimuli (tail pinching; Liu et al, 2004).…”
Section: Potential Drawbacks Of the Isoflurane-anesthetized Forepaw-smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of electrical mapping of the exposed brain have been confirmed using fMRI for cortical localisation of the body's surface. In the rat, fMRI has been successfully used for the mapping of the forepaw (Hyder et al, 1994;Masamoto et al, 2007;Van Camp et al, 2006), the hindpaw (Bock et al, 1998), the tail (Spenger et al, 2000) and the barrel zones of the whiskers (Lu et al, 2005) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the small size of the rodent brain initially made fMRI relatively challenging, recent progress in MR hardware and scanning sequences has overcome these difficulties to allow functional mapping of the brain in response to peripheral sensory stimulation (Spenger et al, 2000;Keilholz et al, 2004). Introduction of ␣-chloralose to animal anesthesia has helped to standardize the technique (Bock et al, 1998;Austin et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%