1997
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.3370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional MRI of Pain- and Attention-Related Activations in the Human Cingulate Cortex

Abstract: The aims of the study were to use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to 1) locate pain-related regions in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of normal human subjects and 2) determine whether each subject's pain-related activation is congruent with ACC regions involved in attention-demanding cognitive processes. Ten normal subjects underwent fMRI with a 1.5-T standard commercial MRI scanner. A conventional gradient echo technique was used to obtain data from a single 4-mm sagittal slice of the left A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
200
2
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
16
200
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute phasic noxious stimulation has been used in most of these studies. Apart from some inconsistencies, there is a general consensus that such stimuli activate the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the mid-/anterior insula of the medial pain system as well as the primary-and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2) of the lateral pain system Talbot et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1994Casey et al, , 1996Coghill et al, 1994;Apkarian, 1995;Davis et al, 1995Davis et al, , 1997Hsieh, 1995;Vogt et al, 1996). These ®ndings support the hypothesis that the experience of pain is processed in a parallel interactive and distributed fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Acute phasic noxious stimulation has been used in most of these studies. Apart from some inconsistencies, there is a general consensus that such stimuli activate the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the mid-/anterior insula of the medial pain system as well as the primary-and secondary somatosensory cortices (S1 and S2) of the lateral pain system Talbot et al, 1991;Casey et al, 1994Casey et al, , 1996Coghill et al, 1994;Apkarian, 1995;Davis et al, 1995Davis et al, , 1997Hsieh, 1995;Vogt et al, 1996). These ®ndings support the hypothesis that the experience of pain is processed in a parallel interactive and distributed fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Also, when the rCBF was regressed on the rated pain intensity across conditions a signi®cant correlation was observed in the ACC (Davis et al, 1997;Derbyshire et al, 1997;Silverman et al, 1997). Thus, subjectively perceived pain intensity/ unpleasentness may be more important for the level of activity in the ACC than the type of pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rostral section (perigenual part) has shown activation in almost all studies where the level of attention was unbalanced between the di¡erent states, which is analogous to the ACC activation in studies of executive attention (Bench et al 1992;Ghatan et al 1995;Pardo et al 1990). In contrasts that are balanced for components of attention, the pain-elicited activation in the ACC is generally more caudal and more con¢ned to the Brodmann area (BA) 24 0 (Davis et al 1997;Hsieh et al 1995). Thus, it seems that the general strati¢cation of the ACC into sub-regions of visceromotor, skeletomotor control cortex and nociceptive cortex, that was developed from animal studies and sparse human lesion data (Devinsky et al 1995), has been con¢rmed by functional imaging in man.…”
Section: The Central Pain Matrixmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…22,[63][64][65][66] Thus, it seems that the ACC does not play a specific role in cognitive interference, but rather is engaged in more general non-specific attentional states that are involved in the execution of the Stroop task (contributing to multiple cognitive functions during the Stroop performance, which become impossible without engagement of divided attention, errors detection, interference conflict, inhibition, affect). Our analysis of connectivity pattern in high vs low interference states suggests involvement of the prefrontal cortex as well, which is not surprising since this area has extensive reciprocal connections with ACC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%