2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy in the neuropsychological assessment of spatial memory: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fNIRS method has been used in numerous studies of working memory [ 31 ] since the frontal cortex associated with this cognitive domain is well accessible to NIRS measurements. In this study, we evaluated NVC responses by comparing the 2‐back (Figure 1 ) and 1‐back (Figure 2 ) task conditions with the 0‐back task condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fNIRS method has been used in numerous studies of working memory [ 31 ] since the frontal cortex associated with this cognitive domain is well accessible to NIRS measurements. In this study, we evaluated NVC responses by comparing the 2‐back (Figure 1 ) and 1‐back (Figure 2 ) task conditions with the 0‐back task condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of these small‐scale tasks include mentally rotating, folding, or melting objects in the mind's eye. These are the types of spatial processes often measured by neuropsychological tests (Llana et al, 2022), and measures of these processes have also been interpreted to reflect visual mental imagery abilities (Jordan et al, 2001). In many cases, such tasks are strongly reliant upon visual working memory or mental manipulation mediated by frontoparietal circuits, as opposed to memory processes classically associated with medial temporal lobe function.…”
Section: Defining Spatial Contexts and Tasks: Navigating Maps Versus ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both fNIRS and fMRI measure alterations in blood flow in the brain, fNIRS has contributed significantly to the field of neuroscience by studying real-life scenarios, high-workload environments, and face-to-face interactions that cannot be evaluated using fMRI ( Hirsch et al, 2021 ). fNIRS is highly versatile, can be used simultaneously with electrophysiological signal monitoring equipment, has better spatial resolution than EEG, and can potentially be used in natural environments ( Llana et al, 2022 ). fNIRS is also insensitive to the movement of study participants; therefore, motion interference in its signals is much smaller than that in electrical signals, making it more suitable for application in natural environments ( Quaresima and Ferrari, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%