2017
DOI: 10.22271/ortho.2017.v3.i4e.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional outcome of patients treated with proximal femoral nail for unstable trochanteric fractures

Abstract: Introduction: Proximal Femoral Nail has become a popular method of stabilization of unstable trochanteric fracture in adults. The aim of our study was to assess functional outcome, radiological result and complications in patient treated with Proximal Femoral Nail in unstable trochanteric fracture. Material& Method: 30 patients were treated with PFN for unstable trochanteric of femur. Patients were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Final outcome assessment included fracture union, impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of intramedullary fixation with the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and PFNA2 in osteoporotic unstable trochanteric fractures is becoming more popular compared to the sliding hip screw due to its advantages, such as reduced limb shortening, decreased collapse at the fracture site, and lower implant failure rates [11]. Although functional outcomes achieved with both implants are similar, PFNA2 is more advantageous than PFN with two screws passed through a deficient lateral wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of intramedullary fixation with the proximal femoral nail (PFN) and PFNA2 in osteoporotic unstable trochanteric fractures is becoming more popular compared to the sliding hip screw due to its advantages, such as reduced limb shortening, decreased collapse at the fracture site, and lower implant failure rates [11]. Although functional outcomes achieved with both implants are similar, PFNA2 is more advantageous than PFN with two screws passed through a deficient lateral wall.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At every follow-up visit, patients were assessed clinically and with an X-ray of the involved hip with the femur to assess union, functional outcome, and complication. Union of fracture was de ned clinico-radiologically as the presence of bridging callus (callus appearance on three or four cortices on anteroposterior and lateral radiograph views 19 ), the number of bridged cortices, and the disappearance of fracture lines; absence of pain or tenderness at the fracture site during weight-bearing. 20,21 Delayed union occurred when there had been an adequate interval of time for healing of the fracture (average time to union for that particular bone) but healing was incomplete.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At every follow-up visit, patients were assessed clinically and with an X-ray of the involved hip with the femur to assess union, functional outcome and complication. Union of fracture was defined clinico-radiologically as the presence of bridging callus (callus appearance on three or four cortices on anteroposterior and lateral radiograph views), the number of bridged cortices and the disappearance of fracture lines; absence of pain or tenderness at the fracture site during weight-bearing [19][20][21]. Delayed union occurred when there had been an adequate interval of time for healing of the fracture (average time to union for that particular bone) but healing was incomplete [20,21].…”
Section: Blood Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%