2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Outcomes After Limb-Salvage Surgery and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction With an Expandable Prosthesis: A Report of 4 Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Stanmore noninvasive prosthesis also seems easier to expand and more durable with less potential for mechanical failure compared with earlier types of noninvasive prostheses such as the Phenix/Repiphysis. 8,24,25 In the current study, mean MSTS score at final follow-up was 88.7% for the 3 patients (4 limbs) treated with a Stryker or Biomet minimally invasive expandable prosthesis compared with a mean MSTS score of 97% in the 4 patients (4 limbs) treated with the Stanmore noninvasive extendible prosthesis. Patients treated with minimally invasive prostheses suffered from extended pain due to soft tissue in-jury and prosthesis revision, whereas all of the patients reconstructed with a noninvasive prosthesis were pain-free.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The Stanmore noninvasive prosthesis also seems easier to expand and more durable with less potential for mechanical failure compared with earlier types of noninvasive prostheses such as the Phenix/Repiphysis. 8,24,25 In the current study, mean MSTS score at final follow-up was 88.7% for the 3 patients (4 limbs) treated with a Stryker or Biomet minimally invasive expandable prosthesis compared with a mean MSTS score of 97% in the 4 patients (4 limbs) treated with the Stanmore noninvasive extendible prosthesis. Patients treated with minimally invasive prostheses suffered from extended pain due to soft tissue in-jury and prosthesis revision, whereas all of the patients reconstructed with a noninvasive prosthesis were pain-free.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Reduced ipsilateral ground reaction forces may enable patients to extend the ipsilateral hip after initial contact. Weakness in ipsilateral hip extensors in patients who underwent endoprosthetic knee replacement, which has been reported 15 previously (Beebe et al, 2009), may be associated with weaker ipsilateral body support during early stance; however, we did not measure hip muscle strength in the patients. In these patients, we did not observe increased hip extension, which has been reported previously (Rompen et al, 2002), possibly because of the small sample size.…”
Section: Compensation By Ipsilateral Limbmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Clinicamente esses pacientes costumam apresentar fraqueza maior para extensão do que para flexão (KENDALL et al, 2000). Nas ressecção distais do fêmur foi encontrado déficit de 21% do torque flexor, no entanto, na literatura os déficits encontrados apresentam grande variação de 2,1% a 50,8% (TSUBOYAMA et al, 1993;BEEBE et al, 2009;BERNTHAL et al, 2015). Para ressecções proximais da tíbia tivemos redução de 36% na força flexora, que foi similar ao encontrado por Bernthal et al, (2015) e Petschnig et al, (1995.…”
Section: Discussão 5 Discussãounclassified
“…Apesar de os resultados funcionais serem considerados bons e excelentes quando se avaliam os valores globais do questionário MSTS (HARDES et al, 2013), Beebe et al, (2009) identificou prejuízo moderado quando apenas os fatores função e marcha são considerados (BEEBE et al, 2009). A avaliação do fator função no questionário é determinada pelas restrições nas atividades e o efeito sobre o estilo de vida do paciente (ENNEKING et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussão 5 Discussãounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation