2008
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Tumor-Related Hemipelvectomy

Abstract: Despite significant differences in surgical procedures, immediate and long-term functional outcomes and quality-of-life parameters were similar among participants with internal and external hemipelvectomies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgical goals for treatment of periacetabular malignancy are primarily aimed toward wide surgical resection in the case of primary sarcomas and the elimination of pain in the case of metastatic disease; however, in both cases, surgeons seek a stable and durable reconstruction, adequate soft tissue reconstruction, preservation or improvement of function, and uneventful wound healing. Many procedures have evolved to help fulfill these goals, including external hemipelvectomy [4,5,18], resection without reconstruction (internal hemipelvectomy) [7,8,14,18,30], arthrodesis [14,18], cement and screw or pin fixation [25,29], rotationplasty [19], pure allograft reconstruction [6,10,17,18,24,27,31,32], allograft-prosthetic-composite reconstruction [17,18], and autoclaved or irradiated autograft [17,29]. None of these procedures seems superior, and each comes with its share of disadvantages-with MSTS scores ranging from 45% to 70% of normal, and major complication rates ranging from 30% to 100%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical goals for treatment of periacetabular malignancy are primarily aimed toward wide surgical resection in the case of primary sarcomas and the elimination of pain in the case of metastatic disease; however, in both cases, surgeons seek a stable and durable reconstruction, adequate soft tissue reconstruction, preservation or improvement of function, and uneventful wound healing. Many procedures have evolved to help fulfill these goals, including external hemipelvectomy [4,5,18], resection without reconstruction (internal hemipelvectomy) [7,8,14,18,30], arthrodesis [14,18], cement and screw or pin fixation [25,29], rotationplasty [19], pure allograft reconstruction [6,10,17,18,24,27,31,32], allograft-prosthetic-composite reconstruction [17,18], and autoclaved or irradiated autograft [17,29]. None of these procedures seems superior, and each comes with its share of disadvantages-with MSTS scores ranging from 45% to 70% of normal, and major complication rates ranging from 30% to 100%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term functional outcomes are similar between patients who underwent external hemipelvectomy and complex limb sparing endoprosthetic reconstruction. In today's cost conscious healthcare environment, answers to such questions may become increasingly important [1,3,5].…”
Section: How Do We Get There?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] As a result, most authors currently advocate replacement of the resected bone using a prosthetic device or allograft, or by using other means to reconstruct the pelvic ring. 6,[12][13][14][15][16][17] Options for reconstruction include allograft,allograft-prosthetic composite, and endoprosthetic reconstruction.…”
Section: Reconstructive Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%