2015
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Outcomes of Multiple Sural Nerve Grafts for Facial Nerve Defects after Tumor-Ablative Surgery

Abstract: BackgroundFunctional restoration of the facial expression is necessary after facial nerve resection to treat head and neck tumors. This study was conducted to evaluate the functional outcomes of patients who underwent facial nerve cable grafting immediately after tumor resection.MethodsPatients who underwent cable grafting from April 2007 to August 2011 were reviewed, in which a harvested branch of the sural nerve was grafted onto each facial nerve division. Twelve patients underwent facial nerve cable graftin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,17,47,50 However, the best possible postoperative outcome is HB Grade III, regardless of the graft material used or the technique employed, because the frontal muscle function rarely recovers and a certain degree of synkinesis is unavoidable after grafting. 2,30,39 The factors that could influence the results of FN reconstruction are discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,17,47,50 However, the best possible postoperative outcome is HB Grade III, regardless of the graft material used or the technique employed, because the frontal muscle function rarely recovers and a certain degree of synkinesis is unavoidable after grafting. 2,30,39 The factors that could influence the results of FN reconstruction are discussed below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscopically, the fascicle count of the FN in the mastoid segment is between 4 and 16. 8 Likewise, the SN consists of 6-12 fascicles 30,51 and hence can be considered to be a compatible graft. Remember, however, that while small-diameter grafts spontaneously revascularize, large-diameter grafts (for example, the SN or greater auricular nerves) do so incompletely due to central necrosis with subsequent endoneurial fibrosis, and this could be a reason for suboptimal results.…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Donor Nerve Graftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a graft donor for many other nerves including the sciatic nerve (Shin et al, 2006), the femoral nerve (Tsuchihara et al, 2008), the oculomotor nerve (Mariniello et al, 1999), the inferior alveolar nerve (Chang et al, 2012), and the facial nerve (Lee et al, 2015). It is a graft donor for many other nerves including the sciatic nerve (Shin et al, 2006), the femoral nerve (Tsuchihara et al, 2008), the oculomotor nerve (Mariniello et al, 1999), the inferior alveolar nerve (Chang et al, 2012), and the facial nerve (Lee et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is a skin sensory nerve, the sural nerve has several clinical uses. It is a graft donor for many other nerves including the sciatic nerve (Shin et al, 2006), the femoral nerve (Tsuchihara et al, 2008), the oculomotor nerve (Mariniello et al, 1999), the inferior alveolar nerve (Chang et al, 2012), and the facial nerve (Lee et al, 2015). Its utility stems from the fact that it is easy to find and harvest due to its usual location in the superficial fascia and just posterior to the lateral malleolus in close association with the small saphenous vein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al demonstrated low rates of synkinesis following sural nerve grafting in 12 patients for facial nerve injuries due to various reasons. 15 While Prasad et al should be congratulated on their large series and good results, their outcomes are only comparable and not superior to those of other smaller series. As a matter of fact, there has not been a substantial improvement in the outcome of facial nerve grafting over the past few decades.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 95%