“…A preliminary review of 6421 papers from various databases was conducted, and after a screening process, finally, 27 papers included in the analysis [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] and involved studies that were all two-by-two comparisons. Besides, the total number of literature on the comparison of HoLEP and TURP was 19 [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] and 5 [ 15 , 19 , 21 , 35 , 36 ] on ThuLEP and TURP respectively, and 3 on the comparison of HoLEP and ThuLEP [ 8 , 20 , 37 ]. The results of the literature screening process are shown in Figure 1 .…”