2004
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0504272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional plasticity of macrophages: reversible adaptation to changing microenvironments

Abstract: There has been substantial research activity in the past decade directed at phenotyping macrophage lineages and defining macrophage functional subsets or patterns of activity. The emphasis over the past 2-3 years has been to divide macrophage functional patterns into type 1 (Th1-driven) or type 2 (Th2-driven) functions. However, a huge array of environmental factors (including cytokines, chemokines, pattern recognition receptors, hormones) differentially regulates macrophage response patterns, resulting in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
562
0
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 660 publications
(584 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
12
562
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively activated macrophages, as distinct from classically activated macrophages, promote wound healing, and macrophages are capable of switching phenotypes under different stimuli. 40 However, 14S,21R-diHDHA did not affect arginase-1 expression under IL-4 stimulus ( Figure 6), a property of alternatively activated macrophages, suggesting that 14S,21R-diHDHA does not act on the macrophage switching to an alternative phenotype. 14S,21R-diHDHA increased IL-10 expression by db/db macrophages under LPS stimulation (Figure 6), suggesting that the recovery of diabetic prohealing functions by 14S,21R-diHDHA may involve augmenting IL-10 generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively activated macrophages, as distinct from classically activated macrophages, promote wound healing, and macrophages are capable of switching phenotypes under different stimuli. 40 However, 14S,21R-diHDHA did not affect arginase-1 expression under IL-4 stimulus ( Figure 6), a property of alternatively activated macrophages, suggesting that 14S,21R-diHDHA does not act on the macrophage switching to an alternative phenotype. 14S,21R-diHDHA increased IL-10 expression by db/db macrophages under LPS stimulation (Figure 6), suggesting that the recovery of diabetic prohealing functions by 14S,21R-diHDHA may involve augmenting IL-10 generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These results indicate that 14S,21R-diHDHA enhanced the anti-inflammatory functions of db/db macrophages. We also assessed the effect of 14S,21R-diHDHA on IL-4-induced alternative activation, 40 which results in a prohealing phenotype in macrophages and characteristically involves arginase-1 expression. 14S,21R-diHDHA did not affect this type of activation of macrophages under the in vitro conditions used in the present study ( Figure 6C).…”
Section: S21r-dihdha Reduces Generation Of Ros and Increases Il-10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as arginase activity was lower in R17 than DA following stimulation with LPS, the MF activation phenotypes cannot be readily classified into the simplistic 'classically' or 'alternatively' activated macrophage categories. 30 One issue that remains to be resolved is whether the APLEC gene products act as receptors for all the various microbial stimulants. Non-exclusive alternatives include that they may modulate responses to the different adjuvants in other ways, for example, through effects on the resultant intracellular signaling pathways or through binding of induced endogenous danger-associated molecular patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of IL-10 to TNF or IL-12 is often used to distinguish M1 from M2 MΦs [16,17]. Although more activation profiles have been identified for MΦs in vivo [18,19], M1, M2a and M2b are the best described functional states. According to Edwards et al, these activation states can be generated in vitro by applying the appropriate inductors: TLR-ligands, such as LPS, together with IFN for M1, IL-4 or IL-13 for M2a and LPS together with immune complexes or apoptotic cells for M2b MΦ phenotypes [9,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%